feat: add more ACs and renumber

protocol/0095-HVMR-high_volume_maker_rebate.md

@@ -120,12 +120,23 @@ Any APIs which report a party's rebate factor should adhere to this cap and retu
 
 #### Capping the effective rebate factor
 
-1. If a party qualifies for a tier where the `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be capped to a maximum and set to (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). In this case no treasury or buyback fees should be collected by the network for trades involving this party. (<a name="0095-HVMR-029" href="#0095-HVMR-029">0095-HVMR-029</a>).
+#### General behaviour
 
-1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` is increased through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-030" href="#0095-HVMR-030">0095-HVMR-030</a>).
-1. If the `treasury_fee_factor` is increased through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-031" href="#0095-HVMR-031">0095-HVMR-031</a>).
-1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` and `treasury_fee_factor` are both increased through a batch proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-032" href="#0095-HVMR-032">0095-HVMR-032</a>).
+1. Given the `treasury_fee_factor` is `0` If a party qualifies for a tier where the `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than `buyback_fee_factor`, their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be capped to a maximum and set to (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). In this case no treasury or buyback fees should be collected by the network for trades involving this party. (<a name="0095-HVMR-029" href="#0095-HVMR-029">0095-HVMR-029</a>).
+1. Given the `buyback_fee_factor` is `0`. If a party qualifies for a tier where the `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than `treasury_fee_factor`, their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be capped to a maximum and set to (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). In this case no treasury or buyback fees should be collected by the network for trades involving this party. (<a name="0095-HVMR-030" href="#0095-HVMR-030">0095-HVMR-030</a>).
+1. If a party qualifies for a tier where the `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be capped to a maximum and set to (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). In this case no treasury or buyback fees should be collected by the network for trades involving this party. (<a name="0095-HVMR-031" href="#0095-HVMR-031">0095-HVMR-031</a>).
 
-1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` is reduced through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-033" href="#0095-HVMR-033">0095-HVMR-033</a>).
-1. If the `treasury_fee_factor` is reduced through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-034" href="#0095-HVMR-034">0095-HVMR-034</a>).
-1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` and `treasury_fee_factor` are both reduced through a batch proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's current `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-035" href="#0095-HVMR-035">0095-HVMR-035</a>).
+##### Program updates
+
+1. If the rebate program is updated such that the `additional_rebate_factor` in the tier the party currently qualifies for is reduced so that the party's new `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be capped to a maximum and set to (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-032" href="#0095-HVMR-032">0095-HVMR-032</a>).
+1. If the rebate program is updated such that the `additional_rebate_factor` in the tier the party currently qualifies for is increased so that the party's new `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-033" href="#0095-HVMR-033">0095-HVMR-033</a>).
+
+#### Network parameter updates
+
+1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` is increased through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-034" href="#0095-HVMR-034">0095-HVMR-034</a>).
+1. If the `treasury_fee_factor` is increased through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-035" href="#0095-HVMR-035">0095-HVMR-035</a>).
+1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` and `treasury_fee_factor` are both increased through a batch proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is greater than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to the new maximum (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`). (<a name="0095-HVMR-036" href="#0095-HVMR-036">0095-HVMR-036</a>).
+
+1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` is reduced through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-037" href="#0095-HVMR-037">0095-HVMR-037</a>).
+1. If the `treasury_fee_factor` is reduced through a proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-038" href="#0095-HVMR-038">0095-HVMR-038</a>).
+1. If the `buyback_fee_factor` and `treasury_fee_factor` are both reduced through a batch proposal in the middle of an epoch such that a party's current `additional_rebate_factor` is less than (`buyback_fee_factor` + `treasury_fee_factor`), their `effective_additional_rebate_factor` should be set to their current `additional_rebate_factor`. (<a name="0095-HVMR-039" href="#0095-HVMR-039">0095-HVMR-039</a>).

protocol/features.json

@@ -325,7 +325,12 @@
       "0095-HVMR-032",
       "0095-HVMR-033",
       "0095-HVMR-034",
-      "0095-HVMR-035"
+      "0095-HVMR-035",
+      "0095-HVMR-036",
+      "0095-HVMR-037",
+      "0095-HVMR-038",
+      "0095-HVMR-039"
+
     ]
   },
   "Unknown": {