fix: when uncrossing after auction refine approximately expanded AMMs… #11736
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #11715
When the crossed region is large we approximate AMM orders to avoid lots of calculations when working out the volume-maximising-range. This approximation is usually fine execpt in the case where the volume-maximising range is bound by a real order on the book. In this situation the AMM's approximate order will straddle with bound and its luck whether the uncrossing will work.
What we do now is that for any AMM's that were expanded approximately, when we come to actually uncross the book, we refine its expansion accurately only in this volume-maximising-range. We then recalculate the volume-maximising-range with the more accurate expansion in the region we actually care about.