Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: add tests for go/vt/sqlparser #15057

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Maniktherana
Copy link
Contributor

@Maniktherana Maniktherana commented Jan 27, 2024

Description

Bumps coverage to 92.6% for analyzer.go

Related Issue(s)

#14931

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 27, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
@Maniktherana Maniktherana changed the title tests: add tests analyzer.go tests: add tests go/vt/sqlparser Jan 27, 2024
@Maniktherana Maniktherana changed the title tests: add tests go/vt/sqlparser tests: add tests for go/vt/sqlparser Jan 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f751c83) 47.49% compared to head (f5ecbb7) 47.55%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15057      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   47.49%   47.55%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1149     1149              
  Lines      239475   239475              
==========================================
+ Hits       113730   113894     +164     
+ Misses     117138   116969     -169     
- Partials     8607     8612       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Maniktherana Maniktherana marked this pull request as draft January 28, 2024 08:23
@Maniktherana Maniktherana marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2024 14:31
@GuptaManan100
Copy link
Member

These tests don't feel very useful. They are testing one-to-one the switch case of the corresponding function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants