Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VReplication: improve reliability of log management #15374

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord commented Feb 27, 2024

Description

In helping someone debug a VReplication failure, we had seen the following:

  1. We failed to create a _vt.vreplication_log record and the apparent cause was that the message was too long
  2. The truncated error message seen in the _vt.vreplication record showed the beginning of a vcopier bulk INSERT query that failed — truncated at 1000 bytes — but not the reason why / error it generated
  3. This _vt.vreplication_log record generation failure may have caused problems in the workflow (e.g. if this happens after the point of no return in a SwitchTraffic then we'll be left in an inconsistent state that needs manual cleanup)

We address all of these issues with the following changes in this PR:

  1. We truncate the message as needed before inserting it into the _vt.vreplication_log table
  2. That truncation happens in the middle of the message so that we don't lose the error shown e.g. after a failed query
  3. We no longer consider failing to write a _vt.vreplication_log record as "fatal" — meaning that the workflow operation does not stop and return the log generation error — and instead only logs an error in the vttablet log

I also moved the existing truncation for the _vt.vreplication.message field over to this new truncation method so that we have the error message there as well.

Related Issue(s)

I didn't create an issue since this felt more like a minor internal cleanup, but I can create one quickly if others disagree.

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Feb 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Feb 27, 2024
@mattlord mattlord added Type: Internal Cleanup Component: VReplication and removed NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Feb 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.21429% with 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.45%. Comparing base (fb4abd5) to head (9a0e780).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/vttablet/tabletmanager/vreplication/utils.go 58.33% 5 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/binlog/binlogplayer/mock_dbclient.go 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
.../vt/vttablet/tabletmanager/vreplication/vcopier.go 25.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/binlog/binlogplayer/dbclient.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtctl/workflow/server.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15374      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.43%   65.45%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1561     1562       +1     
  Lines      193638   193877     +239     
==========================================
+ Hits       126704   126902     +198     
- Misses      66934    66975      +41     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Had a deja vu about this: I thought we had added this truncation a long time ago, because we had seen this error before for long queries.

Turns out we had done it for _vt.vreplication while setting the ubiquitous message column:

func (ct *controller) setMessage(dbClient binlogplayer.DBClient, message string) error {
	ct.blpStats.History.Add(&binlogplayer.StatsHistoryRecord{
		Time:    time.Now(),
		Message: message,
	})
	query := fmt.Sprintf("update _vt.vreplication set message=%v where id=%v", encodeString(binlogplayer.MessageTruncate(message)), ct.id)
	if _, err := dbClient.ExecuteFetch(query, 1); err != nil {
		return fmt.Errorf("could not set message: %v: %v", query, err)
	}
	return nil
}

Maybe we can just update the MessageTruncate function to use your idea of logging enough of the prefix and suffix and use it in this PR as well.

go/vt/vttablet/tabletmanager/vreplication/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/vt/vttablet/tabletmanager/vreplication/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mattlord mattlord removed the NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work label Feb 28, 2024
@mattlord mattlord removed the NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request label Feb 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
@mattlord mattlord marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 16:52
@mattlord mattlord requested a review from dbussink February 28, 2024 16:52
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work.

@mattlord mattlord merged commit b99e150 into vitessio:main Mar 10, 2024
102 checks passed
@mattlord mattlord deleted the vrepl_log_handling branch March 10, 2024 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants