Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VStream: Allow for automatic resume after reshard #15393

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord commented Mar 1, 2024

Description

When the scenario is detected, and we have the needed info, we will start a new copy resume phase to automatically resume when a Reshard has occurred since the last client stream.

Manual test on this branch:

./101_initial_cluster.sh; mysql < ../common/insert_commerce_data.sql; ./201_customer_tablets.sh ; ./202_move_tables.sh; ./203_switch_reads.sh; ./204_switch_writes.sh; ./205_clean_commerce.sh; ./301_customer_sharded.sh; ./302_new_shards.sh; ./303_reshard.sh; ./304_switch_reads.sh; ./305_switch_writes.sh

sleep 10

mysql -e "insert into customer (email) values ('[email protected]')"
mysql -e "insert into customer (email) values ('[email protected]')"

go run vstream_client.go

# In another shell
mysql -e "insert into customer (email) values ('[email protected]')"

You'll see that we did not miss any post Reshard writes.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Mar 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Mar 1, 2024
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the vrepl_reshard_resume branch from 93069ee to c4ba882 Compare March 2, 2024 00:55
@mattlord mattlord closed this Mar 2, 2024
@mattlord mattlord deleted the vrepl_reshard_resume branch March 2, 2024 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant