Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

discovery: Fix tablets removed from healthcheck when topo server GetTablet call fails #15633

Conversation

brendar
Copy link
Contributor

@brendar brendar commented Apr 3, 2024

Description

This PR fixes two bugs that can appear when using Zookeeper as the topo server

  1. topo.Server GetTabletsIndividuallyByCell will return an empty slice on a partial result error from GetTabletMap, which causes TopologyWatcher to remove all tablets from the healthcheck.
  2. After fixing the first bug, TopologyWatcher will still remove any tablets not present in the partial results list.

In order to test these fixes this PR also introduces a more flexible way to return fake errors from memorytopo.

Since the impact of this bug could be pretty disruptive, I think it should be backported to v19.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #15632

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

n/a

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Apr 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.43860% with 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.13%. Comparing base (0e2f175) to head (1c40017).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/topo/memorytopo/lock.go 40.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/topo/memorytopo/file.go 70.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/topo/memorytopo/watch.go 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/topo/memorytopo/directory.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/topo/memorytopo/election.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/topo/tablet.go 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15633      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.13%   68.13%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1556     1556              
  Lines      194984   195032      +48     
==========================================
+ Hits       132849   132881      +32     
- Misses      62135    62151      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@deepthi deepthi added Backport to: release-19.0 Needs to be back ported to release-19.0 and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Apr 3, 2024
@systay systay mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2024
21 tasks
@systay systay mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2024
20 tasks
@deepthi
Copy link
Member

deepthi commented Apr 4, 2024

I believe this is the real fix for a bug originally reported in #3987 !!
EDIT: Not exactly the same, but a similar bug. And a similar fix would work.

Copy link
Member

@deepthi deepthi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great work. The testing improvements are particularly nice.
We'll get another review from @mattlord but LGTM
We don't need to backport beyond v19 because we only started using GetTablets in v19.

Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent work on this @brendar ! Thank you for the great contribution ❤️

@mattlord mattlord merged commit 4caa8d5 into vitessio:main Apr 8, 2024
107 of 117 checks passed
mattlord added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
…opo server GetTablet call fails (#15633) (#15681)

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: All tablets removed from healthcheck when topo server GetTablet call fails
4 participants