Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

schemadiff: DROP COLUMN not eligible for INSTANT algorithm if covered by an index #15714

Merged

Conversation

shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Context: #14877
In evaluating whether a DROP COLUMN is eligible to ALGORITHM=INSTANT, we must make sure that the column is not covered by any existing index. If it is, then dropping the column implies modifying the index, which is a non-INSTANT operation in MySQL.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach added Type: Bug Component: Online DDL Online DDL (vitess/native/gh-ost/pt-osc) labels Apr 15, 2024
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach requested a review from a team April 15, 2024 14:43
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach requested a review from deepthi as a code owner April 15, 2024 14:43
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Apr 15, 2024
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <[email protected]>
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Apr 15, 2024
@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor Author

Might need to update a test, but once it passes I'll merge.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.39%. Comparing base (f118ba2) to head (f908b69).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15714      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.40%   68.39%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1556     1556              
  Lines      195121   195255     +134     
==========================================
+ Hits       133479   133554      +75     
- Misses      61642    61701      +59     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach merged commit 113b975 into vitessio:main Apr 15, 2024
104 of 105 checks passed
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach deleted the schemadiff-instant-drop-col-index branch April 15, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Online DDL Online DDL (vitess/native/gh-ost/pt-osc) Type: Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants