-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Draft] VTGate: Update txn_rollback_shutdown_test.go to actually assert transaction rollback #16839
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Draft] VTGate: Update txn_rollback_shutdown_test.go to actually assert transaction rollback #16839
Conversation
…action rollback Signed-off-by: Brendan Dougherty <[email protected]>
Review ChecklistHello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request. General
Tests
Documentation
New flags
If a workflow is added or modified:
Backward compatibility
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16839 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.54% 69.49% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 1569 1569
Lines 202555 202633 +78
==========================================
- Hits 140865 140829 -36
- Misses 61690 61804 +114 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:
If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed. |
This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:
If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed. |
The original test does not actually assert that the transaction was rolled back. It was just asserting that a new transaction can't see rows written by the other open transaction, which is expected behavior at the default isolation level.
This test now fails with