Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Engine primitive for join-values #17518

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

This PR introduces the engine primitive for executing joins using the VALUES statement instead of a nested loop. This approach reduces network traffic and minimizes the number of queries executed. More details on this feature can be found in the related issue: #16508.

Related Issue(s)

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@frouioui frouioui added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Query Serving and removed NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 15, 2025
@frouioui frouioui changed the title Add the ValuesJoin engine primitive Optimize Join Operations with VALUES Statement Jan 15, 2025
@frouioui frouioui changed the title Optimize Join Operations with VALUES Statement Optimize Join Operations with VALUES Statement Jan 15, 2025
@systay systay changed the title Optimize Join Operations with VALUES Statement Engine primitive for join-values Jan 16, 2025
@systay systay removed the NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work label Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Query Serving Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants