-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use proper groupId
for mysql connector in java
#17540
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Review ChecklistHello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request. General
Tests
Documentation
New flags
If a workflow is added or modified:
Backward compatibility
|
vitess-bot
bot
added
NeedsBackportReason
If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required
NeedsDescriptionUpdate
The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work
NeedsIssue
A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request
NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate
What it says
labels
Jan 15, 2025
frouioui
changed the title
Use proper groupId for mysql connector in java
Use proper Jan 15, 2025
groupId
for mysql connector in java
frouioui
added
Type: Bug
Component: Java
Pull requests that update Java code
Backport to: release-21.0
Needs to be backport to release-21.0
and removed
NeedsDescriptionUpdate
The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work
NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate
What it says
NeedsIssue
A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request
NeedsBackportReason
If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required
labels
Jan 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
frouioui
requested review from
harshit-gangal,
deepthi,
mattlord and
rohit-nayak-ps
as code owners
January 15, 2025 17:21
mattlord
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
deepthi
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
5 tasks
frouioui
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
frouioui
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
…) (#17541) Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport to: release-21.0
Needs to be backport to release-21.0
Component: Java
Pull requests that update Java code
Type: Bug
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR fixes an issue introduced by #17522 where the groupID for the new mysql connector was wrong.
Failures can be observed in: https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/actions/runs/12792629637/job/35663543692?pr=17539
In the original PR the Java tests did not run as the paths filtering rule for the
Docker Test Cluster 10
workflow do no include./java/
. Since Java is the only thing we test in this workflow, I am renaming it toJava Docker Test
to make it more clear.The old workflow must be marked as unrequired for this PR to be mergeable. Once the PR is merged, we will be able to mark the new workflow as required.
Marking this PR as backport to 21, as the original PR is getting backported there (#17527). I will combine both backport into a single one on #17527