forked from StarRocks/starrocks
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pull] main from StarRocks:main #8
Open
pull
wants to merge
2,782
commits into
vivo:main
Choose a base branch
from
StarRocks:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+510,955
−177,919
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: zombee0 <[email protected]>
…shared data (#55859) Signed-off-by: smartlxh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: 絵空事スピリット <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zombee0 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stdpain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qian Ye <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qian Ye <[email protected]>
Why I'm doing: charge_size is the actual memory size occupied by an element, while value_size is the size of the element. For the underlying cache, it only needs to know charge_size for memory accounting purposes. As for the passed-in Item, if it needs to rely on the value_size for decoding, then ensuring that the data structure is self-descriptive. The interface of DataCache only have one param charge_size, so In order to unify PageCache and DataCache, the charge mode of LRUCache will be removed. What I'm doing: Remove charge_mode from LRUCache Signed-off-by: trueeyu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: 絵空事スピリット <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: 絵空事スピリット <[email protected]>
…e coherency problem (#55787) Signed-off-by: Jiao Mingye <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
⤵️ pull
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
merge-conflict
Resolve conflicts manually
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )