Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Polkadot Technical Fellowship details #5267

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

DrW3RK
Copy link
Member

@DrW3RK DrW3RK commented Oct 12, 2023

  • Add updated instructions for becoming a fellowship member
  • Add relevant screenshots
  • Provide examples of Referenda for membership management and XCM calls to the relay chain

@DrW3RK DrW3RK self-assigned this Oct 12, 2023
@DrW3RK DrW3RK added the A1 - In Progress Not ready for review yet. label Oct 12, 2023
@DrW3RK DrW3RK added A2 - Please Review Pull request is ready for review. and removed A1 - In Progress Not ready for review yet. labels Oct 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@CrackTheCode016 CrackTheCode016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm thank you!

@@ -575,6 +575,15 @@ stakeholder voting for a proposed referendum. Members of the Fellowship can vote
Fellowship proposal and the aggregated opinion of the members (weighted by their rank) constitutes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

at some point we should probably have a good reference for how ranks exactly work

@CrackTheCode016 CrackTheCode016 merged commit 441d823 into master Oct 16, 2023
@CrackTheCode016 CrackTheCode016 deleted the tech-fellowship branch October 16, 2023 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A2 - Please Review Pull request is ready for review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants