-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wiki reorg: Edit Comparisons #6394
Conversation
- move content to main comparison page - structure new page
@mmagician I am making a comparison in the wiki between ZK, Optimistic, and Polkadot rollups. I know you are working on ZK rollups and I would like to ask if you can provide a review on the content of this PR 🙏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks over all good, maybe we should mention ELVES at least one though, as that's the formal protocol that parachains follow. It would be nice to incoprorate a comparison of that somewhere here!
Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]>
- redirect - sidebar updates
- sharding - l2beat
@bLd75 review includes: Can’t say for Chainlink because I don't know the tech but that’s pretty good for Polkadot vs OP One thing about decentralization: Polkadot allows decentralization of collators but not mandatory, there are chains having the team operating all collators. While OP doesn’t give a choice, has to be a centralized sequencer. On use cases: yes Polkadot allows smart contract execution through XCM in theory, but in practice it’s almost impossible to use trustlessly: without read access through XCM, you can pass only very simple calls |
Major reorg to the comparisons section.