-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add plugin for moonrepo (moonrepo.dev) #579
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great first PR! Love to merge this in, but I do have a few points of feedback.
assert.deepEqual(counters, { | ||
...baseCounters, | ||
files: 2, | ||
devDependencies: 4, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any chance you could add assertions about issues.devDependencies
for those 4?
|
||
const isEnabled: IsPluginEnabled = ({ dependencies }) => hasDependency(dependencies, enablers); | ||
|
||
const config: string[] = ['**/moon.yml', '.moon/tasks.yml', '.moon/tasks/*.yml']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whenever possible I try to prevent globs starting with **
(as they tend to be more "expensive"). Can we do without, or is there maybe a default location for projects so we can use that default here as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't know how to test this where there's various "workspaces", as I'm trying to simulate a monorepo. So the .moon/tasks.yml and .moon/tasks/*.yml are going to be against the workspace root, while moon.yml lives in the project (package) root. How would I test that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nvm figured it out
assert(issues.binaries['.moon/tasks/typescript.yml']['eslint']); | ||
assert(issues.binaries['apps/a/moon.yml']['vite-node']); | ||
|
||
assert(issues.files.has(join(cwd, 'tools/linters/lint-readme.ts'))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vite-node $workspaceRoot/tools/linters/lint-readme.ts
Ideally, this file would be used, but the plugin doesn't replace $workspaceRoot
(and $projectRoot
. As the plugins receive the YAML contents (as a JS object) I think we can do this replacement before handing it over to getDependenciesFromScripts
? However, I realize that plugins have options.config.cwd
, but not the path to the "repo root" (basically process.cwd()
). For now we can use process.cwd()
and I can fix that up later on by adding it to those options
.
Is this something you could work into this PR? Otherwise I'm happy to take a stab at it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ya I understand what you're going for. Let me see what I can do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The solution looks correct, but I'm still seeing the file unused? What I usually do to debug is something like npx tsx ../../src/cli.ts --debug
from inside the fixtures folder, that should show some insights into what the plugin returns (again, I'm happy to take over, but of course it's cool if you could wrap this up).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I played around with it a bunch and I'm kind of stumped. Is there something funky going on with the runtime?
When I logged the command
on this line, it's correct. When I go into getDependenciesFromScripts
and log npmScripts
on literally the first line, it's showing an empty array.
Any idea what's going on there?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- The tests are "end-to-end" so the first invocation is likely from
package.json
. - I saw a few things were not in place at all, so I just went ahead and added those in this PR (and will clean up later after merging)
Think I addressed everything! Let me know if there's anything else. |
If you're OK with this, I'll merge it! |
Odd, those commits after rebase, no worries about that btw. |
Yup, merge away! Thanks. |
🚀 This pull request is included in v5.9.0. See Release 5.9.0 for release notes. Using Knip in a commercial project? Please consider sponsoring me. |
No description provided.