fixed build error by #192 which failed npm test

[archywillhe]

forgot to run the test previously in #192 and turned out deleting the .md file directly will fail npm test for the contributor specs that safeguards 404 (since I still have two articles linked to my profile).

re-adding a blank contributor profile resolved the problem.

(and thanks for the quick merge previously!)

---

Important

Re-adds archy.md to fix npm test failure due to missing contributor profile.

• Behavior:
  • Re-adds archy.md in jekyll/_contributors/ to resolve npm test failure related to missing contributor profile.
  • Ensures contributor specs that safeguard 404 errors pass by including a blank profile for existing links.

^{This description was created by for 8859994. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new contributor profile for archie, featuring a brief bio and an avatar image.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new contributor entry to the project. The file jekyll/_contributors/archy.md is updated with an entry for "archie" that includes a biography, an avatar image path, and placeholders for the site, email, and Twitter handle. No other files or functionalities are modified.

Changes

File(s) Changed	Change Summary
jekyll/_contributors/archy.md	Added new contributor entry: name "archie", bio "Hi I am archie", avatar "/assets/contributors/archy/avatar.webp", with empty fields for site, email, and Twitter.

Possibly related PRs

• Delete jekyll/_contributors/archy.md #192: This PR involves modifications to the same contributor file, but it removes the entry entirely, indicating a direct conflict with the changes in this PR.

Poem

In the code garden, I hop with glee,
Bringing Archie's story for all to see.
A new name added with a friendly tune,
Hopping along beneath a digital moon.
With paws and whiskers, I cheer the day—
A little rabbit’s ode to our code display!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9401b3 and 8859994.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• jekyll/_contributors/archy.md (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• jekyll/_contributors/archy.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Test & Build

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 8859994 in 48 seconds

More details

• Looked at 15 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. jekyll/_contributors/archy.md:2

• Draft comment:
  Mismatch: file is named 'archy.md' but contributor name is 'archie'. Ensure consistent naming.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  The inconsistency is real and visible in the diff. However, 'archy' and 'archie' are clearly variations of the same name, and this is just a contributor profile file. The difference is minor and unlikely to cause any real issues. This feels more like a nitpick than a substantial problem requiring action.
  The inconsistency could potentially cause confusion in file organization or when referencing the contributor. Also, maintaining consistent naming is generally good practice.
  While consistency is good, this is a minor variation that's unlikely to cause real problems. The connection between 'archy' and 'archie' is obvious to humans.
  Delete this comment as it's too minor of an issue to warrant a change request. The slight name variation won't impact functionality.

2. jekyll/_contributors/archy.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Empty 'site' field: if intentionally blank, consider adding a comment to clarify.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. jekyll/_contributors/archy.md:3

• Draft comment:
  The 'site:' field is empty – if this is intentional, consider adding a comment or placeholder; otherwise, please update with the contributor’s website.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. jekyll/_contributors/archy.md:4

• Draft comment:
  The 'bio' content is very minimal. Consider elaborating the contributor's bio for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. jekyll/_contributors/archy.md:9

• Draft comment:
  There are extra blank lines at the end. Consider removing them for cleaner formatting, unless intentionally preserved.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

Workflow ID: wflow_zT8VK4FN30sUNoHU

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.