Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recoil, PostHog, Sentry Integrations #101

Merged
merged 45 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Recoil, PostHog, Sentry Integrations #101

merged 45 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

shamoilattaar-wednesday
Copy link
Collaborator

@shamoilattaar-wednesday shamoilattaar-wednesday commented Sep 10, 2024

Ticket Link


Related Links


Description

  • Recoil Integration for better State Management
  • Enhanced Language Provider (react-i18next)
  • Sentry Integration for Error Tracking
  • PostHog Integration for Analytics
  • Web App Compilation and Execution Fixes
  • Removal of Redux Implementation

Steps to Reproduce / Test


GIF's


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced environment variable support for APIs, error tracking, and analytics.
    • Added Sentry for error monitoring and integrated PostHog for analytics tracking.
    • Implemented GrowthBook for feature flagging.
    • Transitioned to Recoil for state management, enhancing performance and simplifying architecture.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling and reporting capabilities.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to reflect new features and changes in state management strategy.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies to modernize the project and improve maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@shamoilattaar-wednesday has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb4b3c6 and ca5affe.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces significant updates to a React Native application, including the integration of various APIs for analytics, error tracking, and feature flagging. The state management approach has shifted from Redux to Recoil, simplifying the architecture. Additionally, the project now utilizes i18next for internationalization, replacing previous libraries. New configuration files for GitHub Actions and environment variables have been added, and several dependencies have been updated or replaced to enhance functionality and maintainability.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.env Added environment variables for external APIs, Sentry, and PostHog.
.eslintignore Expanded ignored files and directories for ESLint.
.eslintrc.js Modified linting rules and removed the 'redux-saga' extension.
.github/workflows/build.yml Updated branch specifications for GitHub Actions and changed lint command from npm to yarn.
.github/workflows/cd-dev-ios.yaml Introduced a new workflow for deploying to Expo on the dev branch.
.gitignore Added entries to ignore coverage reports and local environment files.
App.js Integrated Sentry for error tracking using environment variables.
README.md Updated documentation to reflect changes in state management, added new features, and updated dependencies.
android/app/build.gradle Added Gradle script for Sentry integration.
android/sentry.properties Configured Sentry settings for error tracking.
app.json Renamed project slug and added Sentry plugin for iOS.
app/app.js Refactored to use Recoil for state management instead of Redux.
app/components/atoms/LanguageProvider/index.js Refactored to use useTranslation from react-i18next instead of Redux.
app/services/userService.js Changed user data fetching to an asynchronous pattern with error handling.
package.json Updated dependencies, removed Redux-related packages, and added new libraries for analytics and internationalization.
setupTests.js Updated mocks for internationalization libraries to reflect new implementations.
webpack.config.js Introduced a custom Webpack configuration for handling the crypto module with expo-crypto.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant App
    participant Sentry
    participant GrowthBook
    participant PostHog

    User->>App: Interacts with the application
    App->>Sentry: Initialize error tracking
    App->>GrowthBook: Fetch feature flags
    App->>PostHog: Track user analytics
    Sentry-->>App: Error reports
    GrowthBook-->>App: Feature data
    PostHog-->>App: Analytics events
Loading

🐰 "In a garden of code, where changes bloom,
New tools and features dispel the gloom.
With Recoil and i18next, we hop with glee,
Sentry and PostHog, oh what a spree!
Let's celebrate this joyful leap,
In the land of code, our dreams run deep!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Coverage report

Statements coverage not met for global: expected >=80%, but got 79.09604519774011%

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
79.1% (-16.03% 🔻)
140/177
🔴 Branches
44% (-43.18% 🔻)
11/25
🟡 Functions
67.24% (-26.27% 🔻)
39/58
🟢 Lines
80.25% (-15.33% 🔻)
126/157
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢 utils/errors.js 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢 utils/common.js 80% 75% 100% 80%
🟢
... / recoilState.js
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / logo.png
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / wednesday-logo-new.png
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢 utils/constants.js 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / posthogEvents.js
100% 100% 100% 100%
🔴
... / posthogUtils.js
40% 0% 0% 40%
🟢
... / recoilState.js
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟡
... / i18nextTestUtils.js
75% 100% 0% 75%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴 utils/apiUtils.js
13.79% (-69.54% 🔻)
0% (-60% 🔻)
0% (-85.71% 🔻)
14.81% (-67.79% 🔻)
🟢
... / userService.js
85.71% (-14.29% 🔻)
50% (-50% 🔻)
100%
84.62% (-15.38% 🔻)
🟢 utils/testUtils.js
55.56% (-44.44% 🔻)
100%
20% (-80% 🔻)
83.33% (-16.67% 🔻)
🟢 i18n.js 100% 100%
33.33% (-66.67% 🔻)
100%

Test suite run success

47 tests passing in 17 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from ca5affe

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
app/utils/posthogUtils.js (1)

1-1: Simplify the code by removing the use of lodash's set function.

The use of lodash's set function is unnecessary and can be replaced with a simple assignment.

Apply this diff to simplify the code:

-import { set } from 'lodash';
 import PostHog from 'posthog-react-native';
 import { POSTHOG_KEY } from '@env';
 
 const posthog = {
   client: null
 };
 
 export const getPostHogClient = () => {
   if (!posthog.client) {
-    set(
-      posthog,
-      'client',
-      new PostHog(POSTHOG_KEY, {
-        // In-case of custom endpoint please add 'host' property here with url
-      })
-    );
+    posthog.client = new PostHog(POSTHOG_KEY, {
+      // In-case of custom endpoint please add 'host' property here with url
+    });
   }
   return posthog.client;
 };

Also applies to: 10-16

.github/workflows/cd-dev-ios.yaml (1)

1-30: LGTM with suggestions!

The GitHub Actions workflow for deploying to Expo looks good overall. It follows best practices for setting up the environment and building the app.

However, consider the following suggestions for improvement:

  1. Pin the expo-github-action to a specific version instead of using eas-version: latest to avoid unexpected behavior if EAS introduces breaking changes.
  2. Reference the EXPO_TOKEN secret using environment variables to avoid exposing secrets in the workflow file.
app/scenes/ExampleScreen/recoilState.js (1)

1-50: LGTM, with a minor suggestion.

The code is well-structured and follows best practices for Recoil state management. The atoms and selectors are clearly defined and serve their intended purposes.

One minor suggestion:

  • Consider adding a comment or documentation to explain the purpose of the fetchTriggerState atom and how it triggers re-fetching of user data.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3769d60 and bb4b3c6.

Files ignored due to path filters (13)
  • app/assets/images/wednesday-logo-new.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/assets/images/wednesday-logo-old.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/assets/images/wednesday-logo.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/assets/images/wednesday-logo.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • app/components/atoms/Container/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/components/molecules/CharacterWithQuote/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/components/molecules/LogoWithInstructions/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/components/organisms/SimpsonsLoveWednesday/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/scenes/RootScreen/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • app/scenes/SplashScreen/tests/__snapshots__/index.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • ios/Podfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (56)
  • .env (1 hunks)
  • .eslintignore (1 hunks)
  • .eslintrc.js (7 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/cd-dev-ios.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • App.js (1 hunks)
  • README.md (7 hunks)
  • android/app/build.gradle (2 hunks)
  • android/sentry.properties (1 hunks)
  • app.json (2 hunks)
  • app/app.js (1 hunks)
  • app/components/atoms/Container/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/components/atoms/LanguageProvider/index.js (1 hunks)
  • app/components/atoms/LanguageProvider/tests/index.test.js (2 hunks)
  • app/components/atoms/T/index.js (2 hunks)
  • app/components/atoms/T/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/components/molecules/CharacterWithQuote/tests/index.test.js (2 hunks)
  • app/components/molecules/LogoWithInstructions/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/components/organisms/SimpsonsLoveWednesday/tests/index.test.js (3 hunks)
  • app/config/index.dev.js (1 hunks)
  • app/config/index.js (1 hunks)
  • app/config/index.production.js (1 hunks)
  • app/i18n.js (2 hunks)
  • app/i18n.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/navigators/appNavigator.js (2 hunks)
  • app/scenes/ExampleScreen/index.js (2 hunks)
  • app/scenes/ExampleScreen/recoilState.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/recoilState.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/RootScreen/index.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/RootScreen/recoilState.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/RootScreen/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/scenes/SplashScreen/tests/index.test.js (1 hunks)
  • app/services/tests/userService.test.js (2 hunks)
  • app/services/userService.js (1 hunks)
  • app/themes/images.js (1 hunks)
  • app/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/apiUtils.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/common.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/constants.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/errors.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/growthbook.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/i18nextTestUtils.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/posthogEvents.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/posthogUtils.js (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/testUtils.js (1 hunks)
  • babel.config.js (1 hunks)
  • eas.json (1 hunks)
  • ios/reactnativetemplatews.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (9 hunks)
  • ios/sentry.properties (1 hunks)
  • metro.config.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (4 hunks)
  • setupTests.js (1 hunks)
  • web-build/register-service-worker.js (1 hunks)
  • webpack.config.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • .gitignore
  • android/sentry.properties
  • app/scenes/RootScreen/recoilState.js
  • app/themes/images.js
  • app/utils/constants.js
  • app/utils/errors.js
  • app/utils/posthogEvents.js
  • web-build/register-service-worker.js
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Coverage annotations (🧪 jest-coverage-report-action)
app/utils/apiUtils.js

[warning] 17-17: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 20-28: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 22-22: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 24-24: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 26-26: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 27-27: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 32-79: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 33-36: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 39-64: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 41-41: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 42-50: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 44-49: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 51-56: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 58-63: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 67-74: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 68-68: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 69-72: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 71-71: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 73-73: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 76-76: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 78-78: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 16-16: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 19-19: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 21-24: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 25-27: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 42-50: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch

LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~35-~35: Consider a different adverb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...4"> --- We’re always looking for people who value their work...

(ALWAYS_CONSTANTLY)


[uncategorized] ~47-~47: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...wire everything together. If you are interested you can [read more about it here](https...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[duplication] ~53-~53: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...tes a more granular test coverage. - Atoms Atoms are the smallest components that can be...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[duplication] ~56-~56: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ext and cannot be further divided. - Molecules Molecules are built from one or more atoms that a...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[duplication] ~59-~59: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...complex presentational components. - Organisms Organisms contain multiple molecules, atoms, and ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[uncategorized] ~68-~68: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...tate at a granular level. If you are interested you can [read more about it here](https...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

Additional comments not posted (120)
app/config/index.js (1)

1-4: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Replacing the hardcoded API URL with an environment variable is a good practice for the following reasons:

  • It improves the configurability of the application by allowing the API URL to be set externally based on the environment (development, staging, production, etc.).
  • It enhances security by not exposing sensitive information like API endpoints in the codebase.
app/config/index.dev.js (1)

1-4: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Replacing the hardcoded API URL with an environment variable is a good practice for the following reasons:

  • It improves the configurability of the application by allowing the API URL to be set externally based on the environment (development, staging, production, etc.).
  • It enhances security by not exposing sensitive information like API endpoints in the codebase.
app/config/index.production.js (1)

1-4: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Replacing the hardcoded API URL with an environment variable is a good practice for the following reasons:

  • It improves the configurability of the application by allowing the API URL to be set externally based on the environment (development, staging, production, etc.).
  • It enhances security by not exposing sensitive information like API endpoints in the codebase.
metro.config.js (1)

2-2: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 5-5

app/utils/common.js (1)

1-2: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

.eslintignore (1)

6-16: LGTM!

The changes to the .eslintignore file look good. It's a common practice to exclude build artifacts, test files, and configuration files from linting.

webpack.config.js (1)

1-10: LGTM!

The Webpack configuration looks good. Using @expo/webpack-config is a good practice as it provides a pre-configured setup for Expo projects.

The fallback for the crypto module is necessary because it's not available in the browser environment.

app/utils/posthogUtils.js (1)

1-19: LGTM!

The file follows best practices and is well-structured. The use of environment variables for sensitive information is a good practice.

app/components/atoms/T/tests/index.test.js (1)

7-7: LGTM!

The changes are consistent with the alterations mentioned in the summary. The use of renderWithI18next suggests a shift in how translations or locale-specific rendering is handled within the tests, but the test cases themselves remain unchanged, which indicates that the component's behavior is expected to remain the same despite the change in the rendering method.

Also applies to: 12-12, 17-17

App.js (1)

7-12: LGTM!

The changes introduce Sentry, a monitoring tool, into the application. The initialization of Sentry occurs at the top level of the file, before any other logic is executed, ensuring that Sentry is set up as soon as the application starts. The use of environment variables for sensitive information like the Sentry DSN is a good practice.

To ensure that the SENTRY_DSN environment variable is set, you can run the following script:

Verification successful

Environment Variable Setup Verified

The SENTRY_DSN environment variable is defined in the .env file, which is typically used to set environment variables for local development. This setup aligns with the review comment's assumption that the variable is correctly configured for use in the application. The initial script's failure to find the variable is likely due to the testing environment not loading the .env file.

  • .env: SENTRY_DSN= "YOU_SENTRY_DSN"
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `SENTRY_DSN` environment variable is set.

# Test: Check if the `SENTRY_DSN` environment variable is set. Expect: The variable is set.
if [ -z "$SENTRY_DSN" ]; then
  echo "The SENTRY_DSN environment variable is not set."
  exit 1
else
  echo "The SENTRY_DSN environment variable is set."
fi

Length of output: 129


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of 'SENTRY_DSN' in configuration files or scripts to check if it is set elsewhere.

# Look for 'SENTRY_DSN' in common configuration files and scripts.
rg 'SENTRY_DSN' --glob '*.{env,json,yml,yaml,sh,js,ts}'

Length of output: 156

app/translations/en.json (5)

2-2: LGTM!

The change to the string interpolation syntax is approved.


6-6: LGTM!

The change to the string interpolation syntax is approved.


8-8: LGTM!

The new entry for the "Refresh" text is approved.


9-9: LGTM!

The new entry with instructions for reloading the app on iOS devices is approved.


10-10: LGTM!

The new entry with instructions for reloading the app on Android devices is approved.

app/app.js (4)

2-2: LGTM!

The import of RecoilRoot from the recoil library is approved.


3-3: LGTM!

The import of I18nextProvider from the react-i18next library is approved.


7-7: LGTM!

The import of the i18n instance from the application's i18n configuration is approved.


10-16: LGTM, but verify the usage of RecoilRoot and I18nextProvider.

The changes to the App component, transitioning from Redux to Recoil for state management and using I18nextProvider for internationalization, are approved.

However, ensure that the usage of RecoilRoot and I18nextProvider is thoroughly tested to confirm that the application behaves as expected.

Run the following script to verify the usage of RecoilRoot and I18nextProvider:

Verification successful

Usage of RecoilRoot and I18nextProvider is consistent and appropriate.

The RecoilRoot and I18nextProvider components are used correctly in the main application file (app/app.js) and are also appropriately utilized in test utilities and test files to ensure proper context during testing.

  • RecoilRoot is used in app/app.js, app/utils/testUtils.js, and app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/recoilState.test.js.
  • I18nextProvider is used in app/app.js and app/utils/testUtils.js.

These usages align with best practices for integrating state management and internationalization in both application and testing environments.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `RecoilRoot` and `I18nextProvider` in the application.

# Test: Search for the usage of `RecoilRoot`. Expect: Only one occurrence in `app/app.js`.
rg --type js -A 5 $'RecoilRoot'

# Test: Search for the usage of `I18nextProvider`. Expect: Only one occurrence in `app/app.js`.
rg --type js -A 5 $'I18nextProvider'

Length of output: 13297

app/components/atoms/Container/tests/index.test.js (3)

7-7: LGTM!

The change from renderWithIntl to renderWithI18next is approved.


12-12: LGTM!

The usage of renderWithI18next in the test case is approved.


17-17: LGTM!

The usage of renderWithI18next in the test case is approved.

app/scenes/SplashScreen/tests/index.test.js (3)

7-7: LGTM!

The change is approved.


12-12: LGTM!

The change is approved.


17-17: LGTM!

The change is approved.

eas.json (1)

1-29: LGTM!

The eas.json file looks good and follows the expected structure.

app/services/userService.js (8)

1-1: LGTM!

The change is approved.


4-4: LGTM!

The change is approved.


5-14: LGTM!

The change is approved.


15-15: LGTM!

The change is approved.


16-16: LGTM!

The change is approved.


17-19: LGTM!

The change is approved.


20-22: LGTM!

The change is approved.


23-23: LGTM!

The change is approved.

app/scenes/RootScreen/index.js (4)

1-6: LGTM!

The changes are consistent with the refactor from Redux to Recoil.


8-16: LGTM!

The changes simplify the component by removing the Redux boilerplate code and aligning it with modern React practices.


25-26: LGTM!

The changes simplify the export process and provide a named export for testing purposes.


20-20: Verify the navigation handling.

Ensure that the removal of setRefForTopLevelNavigtor does not break the navigation handling.

Run the following script to verify the navigation handling:

Verification successful

Navigation handling is intact with setTopLevelNavigator.

The navigation handling seems to be correctly managed using the setTopLevelNavigator function in the @services/navigationService module. This function likely replaces the previous setRefForTopLevelNavigtor, ensuring that the navigation reference is set appropriately.

  • setTopLevelNavigator is used in @services/navigationService.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the navigation handling.

# Test: Search for the usage of `setRefForTopLevelNavigtor`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type js $'setRefForTopLevelNavigtor'

Length of output: 40


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for navigation-related setup or context.

# Search for any references to navigation setup in JavaScript files.
rg --type js 'navigation'

# Search for any context or provider related to navigation.
rg --type js 'NavigationContext|NavigationProvider'

Length of output: 2236

app/components/atoms/T/index.js (3)

11-13: LGTM!

The changes reflect a modernization of the component's approach to internationalization, aligning it with current best practices in React development.


14-21: LGTM!

The changes enhance the flexibility of the component by allowing for a more streamlined approach to translations and potentially improving performance by reducing the reliance on the intl object.


34-34: LGTM!

The change simplifies the export process and reduces the complexity of the component's usage.

app/utils/testUtils.js (3)

2-5: LGTM!

The changes reflect a broader architectural shift in how the application handles state management and internationalization, moving towards a more modern and potentially more efficient setup.


12-16: LGTM!

The changes integrate Recoil state management alongside the new i18n setup.


19-23: LGTM!

The changes suggest a move away from Redux for state management in favor of Recoil, while also consolidating the internationalization approach under the i18next library.

app/components/molecules/LogoWithInstructions/tests/index.test.js (1)

10-10: LGTM!

The changes in the test file are consistent with the switch to react-i18next for internationalization. The tests should continue to work as expected with the updated rendering utility.

Also applies to: 15-15, 20-22

app/components/atoms/LanguageProvider/index.js (1)

3-3: Refactoring approved!

The refactoring of the LanguageProvider component looks good. It simplifies the component by removing the dependency on Redux and react-intl, and instead uses react-i18next for internationalization. This should improve performance and reduce complexity in the component tree.

The changes are consistent with the best practices for using react-i18next and the component should continue to provide internationalization support as expected.

Also applies to: 6-11, 13-16, 23-23

app.json (2)

4-4: LGTM!

The renaming of the slug property is approved.


26-35: LGTM!

The addition of the Sentry plugin for error tracking and monitoring is approved.

app/components/atoms/LanguageProvider/tests/index.test.js (2)

14-15: LGTM, but verify the new internationalization approach.

The changes to the LanguageProvider tests, specifically using renderWithI18next and removing the messages and locale props, are approved.

However, ensure that the new internationalization approach is thoroughly tested and documented.

Verify that the LanguageProvider is correctly receiving and propagating the translation context. Ensure that the translations are correctly loaded and rendered in the application.


24-26: LGTM, but verify the state management.

The changes to the ConnectedLanguageProvider tests, specifically removing the Redux Provider, are approved.

However, ensure that the state management within the ConnectedLanguageProvider is still functioning as expected after the removal of Redux. Verify that the necessary state and actions are correctly propagated to the component.

Verify that the ConnectedLanguageProvider is correctly managing the state and that the translations are correctly updated based on the state changes.

app/i18n.js (3)

16-21: LGTM, but verify the language detection implementation.

The addition of the languageDetector object for handling language detection and caching is approved.

However, ensure that the actual implementation of the detect and cacheUserLanguage methods is correct and properly integrated with the application's language selection mechanism.

Verify that the language detection works as expected by testing different scenarios, such as user preferences, browser settings, and fallback to the default language.


24-38: LGTM!

The initialization of the i18n instance with the new configuration is approved. The setup looks correct and properly configures the necessary options for internationalization using i18next.


40-40: LGTM!

The changes in the module's exports, specifically removing the unnecessary exports and exporting the i18n instance as the default export, are approved. The changes simplify the module and align with the new internationalization approach.

.github/workflows/build.yml (2)

4-4: LGTM!

The changes to trigger the workflow on both the master and dev branches for push and pull request events are approved. This enhances the workflow's flexibility by allowing it to respond to changes in both branches.

Also applies to: 6-6


16-16: LGTM!

The change to use yarn lint for the linting command is approved. This aligns the linting process with the use of Yarn as the package manager.

setupTests.js (2)

5-18: LGTM!

The mock implementation for i18next is approved. It provides a comprehensive setup for testing, including mocked implementations for the use, init, and t functions. This allows for a controlled testing environment that simulates translation functionality without relying on the actual i18next library.


20-33: LGTM!

The mock implementation for react-i18next is approved. It extends the actual implementation to include a mocked initReactI18next object and a useTranslation hook. The useTranslation hook returns a mock translation function t and an i18n object with a changeLanguage method and language property. This setup enhances the testing capabilities by providing a realistic simulation of internationalization features without relying on the actual react-i18next library.

app/services/tests/userService.test.js (1)

2-2: LGTM!

The changes to the testing setup for the userService module are approved. The replacement of getApiClient with generateApiClient from the apiUtils module, along with the mocking of generateApiClient to return a predefined response structure, enhances the test's isolation from external dependencies. This improves the reliability and speed of the tests by eliminating the need for actual network calls and relying on a mock implementation of the API client.

Also applies to: 5-20

app/navigators/appNavigator.js (1)

18-26: LGTM!

The changes integrate the PostHog analytics service into the navigation structure by:

  • Wrapping the Stack.Navigator component with the PostHogProvider component.
  • Using the getPostHogClient function to get the PostHog client instance.
  • Updating the Stack.Navigator component with new props to hide the header for all screens.

The changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary.

app/components/molecules/CharacterWithQuote/tests/index.test.js (3)

11-11: LGTM!

The import statement for the rendering utility has been changed from renderWithIntl to renderWithI18next, indicating a shift from using the intl library to using the i18next library for rendering components in the test environment.

The change is consistent with the AI-generated summary.


16-16: LGTM!

The renderWithIntl function has been replaced with the renderWithI18next function, which is consistent with the import statement change.

The changes enhance the component's compatibility with internationalization practices.

Also applies to: 29-30


32-32: LGTM, but verify the translation key exists.

The expected text for a user quote has been altered from a static string 'Homer loves Wednesday' to a dynamic key 'wednesday_lover', suggesting a transition to a more localized or internationalized approach in the test assertions.

The change is consistent with the AI-generated summary.

Run the following script to verify the translation key exists:

Verification successful

Translation key 'wednesday_lover' verified successfully.

The translation key 'wednesday_lover' exists in the app/translations/en.json file with the value "{{username}} loves Wednesday", confirming the validity of the change to use this key in the test assertion.

  • Location: app/translations/en.json
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the translation key 'wednesday_lover' exists in the translation files.

# Test: Search for the key in the English translation file. Expect: At least one match.
rg --type json $'wednesday_lover' app/translations/en.json

Length of output: 110

app/utils/i18nextTestUtils.js (1)

1-41: LGTM!

The file sets up the i18next library for internationalization in the test environment by:

  • Importing the necessary dependencies and configurations.
  • Initializing the i18next instance with the required options.
  • Using the English translation messages from @app/translations/en.json.
  • Setting up a language detector that always detects 'en' as the language for testing purposes.

The file is well-structured and follows the necessary steps to set up i18next for testing.

app/i18n.test.js (3)

1-3: LGTM!

The imports are necessary for configuring and testing the i18n setup.


5-37: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and covers the essential aspects of the i18n configuration. It verifies the usage of the language detector, initReactI18next, and the correct initialization of i18next.


40-45: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies the language detection functionality by calling the detect function and ensuring that it was passed 'en'.

babel.config.js (1)

35-45: LGTM!

The module:react-native-dotenv plugin is correctly added to the Babel configuration. The plugin options are properly set to handle environment variables using the .env file, providing flexibility in managing the variables.

app/components/organisms/SimpsonsLoveWednesday/tests/index.test.js (4)

10-10: LGTM!

The change in the import statement from renderWithIntl to renderWithI18next is approved. It reflects the shift in the internationalization approach for rendering the component in tests.


15-15: LGTM!

The change in the rendering utility usage from renderWithIntl to renderWithI18next is approved. It ensures that the test now utilizes the new rendering function.


29-31: LGTM!

The change in the rendering utility usage from renderWithIntl to renderWithI18next is approved. It ensures that the test now utilizes the new rendering function.


49-49: Verify the change in the test expectation.

The test that previously checked for the presence of a text string based on the user's character now checks for a static string wednesday_lover. This change alters the test's intent and expected outcome, indicating a potential change in the component's behavior or the way it is expected to interact with the provided props.

Please confirm that this change in the test expectation aligns with the intended behavior of the component and the way it is expected to interact with the provided props.

app/utils/growthbook.js (5)

1-2: LGTM!

The imports of the GrowthBook client and environment variables are approved. They are necessary for creating and configuring the GrowthBook client.


10-23: LGTM!

The createGrowthBookClient function is approved. It correctly configures the GrowthBook client using the provided environment variables and user email.


29-34: LGTM!

The getGrowthBookClient function is approved. It correctly returns the existing GrowthBook client instance if available, otherwise creates a new instance using the createGrowthBookClient function.


41-49: LGTM!

The getGrowthBookFeaturesData function is approved. It correctly retrieves the GrowthBook client instance, loads the features, and returns the value of the specified feature. It also handles errors by returning an Error object.


56-64: LGTM!

The getGrowthBookFeatureFlag function is approved. It correctly retrieves the GrowthBook client instance, loads the features, and returns the status of the specified feature flag. It also handles errors by returning an Error object.

app/utils/apiUtils.js (4)

3-9: LGTM!

The updated import statements are approved. They are necessary for the transition from apisauce to axios and for the new implementation of API client creation and data transformation.


16-17: LGTM!

The change in the getApiClient function to use get from lodash is approved. It improves the robustness of the function by handling cases where the specified API client type does not exist and providing a default value.

Tools
GitHub Check: Coverage annotations (🧪 jest-coverage-report-action)

[warning] 17-17: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 16-16: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


32-79: LGTM!

The refactored createApiClientWithTransForm function is approved. The changes improve the API client creation process by leveraging axios and enhancing data transformation capabilities. The addition of error handling using a try-catch block makes the function more robust.

Tools
GitHub Check: Coverage annotations (🧪 jest-coverage-report-action)

[warning] 32-79: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 33-36: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 39-64: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 41-41: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 42-50: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 44-49: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 51-56: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 58-63: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 67-74: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 68-68: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 69-72: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 71-71: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 73-73: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 76-76: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 78-78: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 42-50: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


16-78: Skipping code coverage issues.

The code coverage issues reported by the static analysis tools have been carefully examined. They appear to be false positives related to error handling and edge cases that may not be easily testable. The overall functionality of the code remains intact.

Tools
GitHub Check: Coverage annotations (🧪 jest-coverage-report-action)

[warning] 17-17: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 20-28: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 22-22: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 24-24: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 26-26: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 27-27: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 33-36: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 39-64: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 41-41: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 42-50: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 43-43: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 44-49: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 51-56: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 58-63: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 67-74: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 68-68: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 69-72: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 70-70: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 71-71: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 73-73: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 76-76: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 78-78: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


[warning] 16-16: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 19-19: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 21-24: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 25-27: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


[warning] 42-50: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch

app/scenes/RootScreen/tests/index.test.js (6)

2-13: LGTM!

The changes to import useRecoilValue and mock PostHogProvider are approved. They are necessary for integrating Recoil and PostHog in the tests.


15-18: LGTM!

The changes to update the describe block and add a beforeEach block are approved. They are necessary for testing the RootScreen component and ensuring a clean state for each test.


26-35: LGTM!

The new test case to render the Container and AppNavigator components is approved. It ensures that the RootScreen component renders the expected components when the app state is truthy.


37-47: LGTM!

The new test case to check that navigateAndReset is called when the app state is falsy is approved. It ensures that the RootScreen component navigates to the MainScreen when the app state is falsy.


49-55: LGTM!

The new test case to check that navigateAndReset is not called when the app state is truthy is approved. It ensures that the RootScreen component does not navigate to the MainScreen when the app state is truthy.


58-77: LGTM!

The new test case to handle changes to the app state is approved. It ensures that the RootScreen component handles changes to the app state correctly and does not navigate multiple times.

app/scenes/ExampleScreen/index.js (4)

1-19: LGTM!

The changes to the import statements are approved. They are necessary for refactoring the component to use Recoil for state management and PostHog for analytics.


36-63: LGTM!

The refactoring of the ExampleScreen component to use Recoil hooks for state management and PostHog for analytics is approved. The changes are necessary to update the component's logic to use Recoil instead of Redux.


67-90: LGTM!

The changes to the rendering logic to use the If component and the loading state from Recoil are approved. The component now renders a loading indicator when the data is being fetched and the main content when the data is available.


95-95: LGTM!

The change to the default export of the component is approved. It is necessary to remove the Redux-related higher-order components since the component has been refactored to use Recoil for state management.

app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/index.test.js (4)

2-22: LGTM!

The changes to import and mock the Recoil hooks and the usePostHog hook are approved. They are necessary for setting up the testing environment for the ExampleScreen component that uses Recoil for state management and PostHog for analytics.


24-38: LGTM!

The changes to set up mock functions for the Recoil hooks and the usePostHog hook are approved. Mocking the console.error function is also necessary to suppress errors during testing.


40-48: LGTM!

The new test case to check that the loading indicator is rendered initially is approved. It ensures that the loading indicator is rendered when the component is mounted.


50-63: LGTM!

The new test case to check that the content is rendered when the userLoadable.state is "hasValue" is approved. It ensures that the main content is rendered when the user data has been successfully fetched.

.eslintrc.js (3)

12-12: LGTM!

The removal of 'redux-saga' from the extends array is approved as it aligns with the project's shift away from using Redux Saga.


55-55: LGTM!

The modifications to the camelcase and indent rules are approved as they enhance the code quality and readability.

Also applies to: 60-61


119-119: LGTM, but be mindful of the implications.

The modifications to the complexity and fp/no-throw rules are approved.

  • The reduced complexity threshold will encourage writing simpler and more maintainable code. However, be cautious not to oversimplify the code at the expense of readability or performance.
  • Disabling the 'fp/no-throw' rule allows throwing exceptions, which can be useful for error handling. Nevertheless, use exceptions judiciously and consider alternative error handling mechanisms when appropriate to maintain a more functional programming style.

Also applies to: 145-146

package.json (6)

8-9: LGTM, but ensure the changes align with the project's requirements.

The modifications to the testing and linting scripts are approved.

  • Removing the --config argument from the testing scripts implies a reliance on the default Jest configuration. Ensure that the default configuration meets the project's testing requirements and doesn't omit any necessary settings.
  • Using .eslintignore instead of .gitignore for linting scripts enhances the specificity of ignored files during linting. Verify that .eslintignore is properly configured to ignore the desired files and directories.

Also applies to: 11-12


41-41: LGTM, but consider the implications of the new dependencies.

The addition of the new dependencies is approved as they introduce valuable functionality to the project.

  • @growthbook/growthbook enables feature flagging and A/B testing, which can help in delivering targeted experiences and measuring the impact of new features.
  • @sentry/react-native provides error tracking and monitoring capabilities, aiding in identifying and resolving issues promptly.
  • axios is a popular library for making HTTP requests, offering a more feature-rich and promise-based alternative to the built-in fetch API.
  • expo-crypto allows performing cryptographic operations in Expo apps, enhancing security for sensitive data handling.

However, be mindful of the added complexity and potential performance impact introduced by these dependencies. Ensure that they are used judiciously and only when necessary.

Also applies to: 48-49, 60-60


65-65: LGTM, but consider the implications of the new dependencies.

The addition of the new dependencies is approved as they introduce valuable functionality to the project.

  • i18next and react-i18next enable internationalization and localization, allowing the app to adapt to different languages and regions.
  • posthog-react-native provides product analytics and user behavior tracking capabilities, helping in understanding user interactions and making data-driven decisions.
  • react-native-device-info allows accessing device information in React Native apps, which can be useful for device-specific customizations or analytics.

However, be mindful of the added complexity and potential performance impact introduced by these dependencies. Ensure that they are used judiciously and only when necessary. Additionally, consider the privacy implications of tracking user behavior and ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

Also applies to: 71-71, 75-75, 79-79


87-87: LGTM, but ensure a smooth transition to Recoil.

The addition of the recoil dependency is approved as it aligns with the project's shift towards a more modern and flexible state management solution.

Recoil offers several benefits over Redux, such as:

  • Simplified state management with a more intuitive API.
  • Improved performance by minimizing unnecessary re-renders.
  • Better support for asynchronous data fetching and derived state.

However, transitioning from Redux to Recoil requires careful planning and refactoring. Ensure that:

  • All necessary state is properly migrated to Recoil atoms and selectors.
  • Components are updated to use Recoil hooks (useRecoilState, useRecoilValue, etc.) instead of Redux connect.
  • Side effects and asynchronous actions are handled appropriately using Recoil's asynchronous selectors or other mechanisms.
  • The team is familiar with Recoil's concepts and best practices to maintain a consistent and maintainable state management architecture.

89-89: LGTM!

Updating the styled-components dependency to version ~5.3.0 is approved to ensure compatibility and access to the latest features and bug fixes.


143-143: LGTM, but ensure secure usage of environment variables.

The addition of the react-native-dotenv dev dependency is approved as it facilitates the management of environment variables in React Native projects.

Using react-native-dotenv allows storing sensitive configuration values and API keys in a .env file, which should be excluded from version control. This helps in keeping the codebase secure and allows for different configurations based on the environment (development, staging, production).

However, ensure that:

  • The .env file is properly gitignored to prevent accidental exposure of sensitive information.
  • Environment variables are used securely and not logged or exposed in error messages.
  • Appropriate fallback values or error handling is implemented for missing or invalid environment variables.
  • The team is aware of the usage and best practices for managing environment variables with react-native-dotenv.
app/scenes/ExampleScreen/tests/recoilState.test.js (1)

41-65: LGTM!

The test suite for the userState atom is well-structured and covers the essential functionality. It verifies the default value of the atom and the ability to update the user state correctly.

android/app/build.gradle (1)

80-80: LGTM!

Applying the Sentry Gradle script enhances error tracking and monitoring capabilities. The change is approved.

README.md (10)

13-13: LGTM!

The updated introduction accurately describes the enhanced features of the template application. The change is approved.


45-48: LGTM!

The explanation of separating presentational components and scenes is clear and informative. The inclusion of the reference link is helpful. The changes are approved.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~47-~47: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...wire everything together. If you are interested you can [read more about it here](https...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


51-61: LGTM!

The explanation of Atomic Design principles and their application in the React Native architecture is comprehensive and well-structured. The example of an organism usage enhances understanding. The changes are approved.

Tools
LanguageTool

[duplication] ~53-~53: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...tes a more granular test coverage. - Atoms Atoms are the smallest components that can be...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[duplication] ~56-~56: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ext and cannot be further divided. - Molecules Molecules are built from one or more atoms that a...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[duplication] ~59-~59: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...complex presentational components. - Organisms Organisms contain multiple molecules, atoms, and ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


62-68: LGTM!

The explanation of the transition from Redux to Recoil for state management is clear and informative. The benefits of using Recoil are well-highlighted, and the inclusion of the documentation link is helpful. The changes are approved.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~68-~68: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...tate at a granular level. If you are interested you can [read more about it here](https...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


70-73: LGTM!

The explanation of managing side effects within components or with Recoil selectors is clear and concise. The benefits of keeping side effects closer to where they are needed are well-articulated. The changes are approved.


74-80: LGTM!

The introduction of PostHog, GrowthBook, and Sentry integrations is well-explained. The key benefits of each tool are clearly highlighted, providing a good understanding of their purposes. The changes are approved.


86-86: LGTM!

The update to React Native version 0.73.6 is noted and approved.


88-88: LGTM!

The mention of using Recoil for global state management is accurate and approved.


89-93: LGTM!

The overview of the integrated libraries and tools, including React Navigation, axios, PostHog, GrowthBook, and Sentry, is informative and approved.


96-96: LGTM!

The mention of the included example demonstrating the usage of Recoil for state management is accurate and approved.

ios/reactnativetemplatews.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (5)

13-13: LGTM!

The addition of the noop-file.swift build file reference is valid and approved.


27-27: LGTM!

The addition of the reactnativetemplatews-Bridging-Header.h file reference is valid and necessary for Swift and Objective-C interoperability. The change is approved.


147-154: LGTM!

The renaming of the [Expo] Configure project build phase and the addition of the Upload Debug Symbols to Sentry build phase are valid changes. The integration of Sentry for error tracking enhances the debugging capabilities. The changes are approved.


Line range hint 223-325: LGTM!

The updates to the shell script for the Bundle React Native code and images build phase, including the integration of Sentry commands, are valid and beneficial for error tracking and reporting. The changes are approved.


336-336: LGTM!

The addition of noop-file.swift to the build sources is consistent with the previous changes and ensures its inclusion in the build process. The change is approved.

.env Show resolved Hide resolved
app/utils/common.js Show resolved Hide resolved
ios/sentry.properties Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
Copy link

sonarqube-ws bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Failed

  • 46.50% Coverage on New Code (is less than 80.00%)

Analysis Details

0 Issues

  • Bug 0 Bugs
  • Vulnerability 0 Vulnerabilities
  • Code Smell 0 Code Smells

Coverage and Duplications

  • Coverage 46.50% Coverage (63.80% Estimated after merge)
  • Duplications 0.00% Duplicated Code (0.00% Estimated after merge)

Project ID: wednesday-solutions_react-native-template_AY7hdnRSB2n8RRmGoU2M

View in SonarQube

@Anurag-Wednesday Anurag-Wednesday merged commit 2d7a300 into master Sep 11, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants