-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/add sonar #84
Feat/add sonar #84
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@alichherawalla has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThis update enhances a React Native project for Android, focusing on improved build configurations, debugging tools, and code management. Key changes include the introduction of new build scripts, updating Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Coverage reportTotal coverage
Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 21153ad |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 9
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.13) | ||
|
||
# Define the library name here. | ||
project(reactnativetemplatews_appmodules) | ||
|
||
# This file includes all the necessary to let you build your application with the New Architecture. | ||
include(${REACT_ANDROID_DIR}/cmake-utils/ReactNative-application.cmake) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Review Summary
The verification script aimed to check if the REACT_ANDROID_DIR
environment variable is set and points to a valid directory. The output indicates that this environment variable is not set, which means the directory inclusion in the CMakeLists.txt
file might not function as expected during the build process.
Actionable Directive
The REACT_ANDROID_DIR
environment variable is crucial for the JNI build configuration in CMakeLists.txt
. It appears that this environment variable is not set in your build environment, which could lead to build failures or unexpected behavior. Please ensure that REACT_ANDROID_DIR
is correctly defined and points to the appropriate directory containing ReactNative-application.cmake
.
Analysis chain
The JNI build configuration in CMakeLists.txt
is correctly set up for the new React Native architecture. Ensure that the REACT_ANDROID_DIR
environment variable is correctly defined in your build environment.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if REACT_ANDROID_DIR is set and points to a valid directory
echo "REACT_ANDROID_DIR is set to: $REACT_ANDROID_DIR"
[ -d "$REACT_ANDROID_DIR" ] && echo "Directory exists" || echo "Directory does not exist"
Length of output: 143
@Override | ||
protected synchronized void maybeLoadOtherSoLibraries() { | ||
if (!sIsSoLibraryLoaded) { | ||
// If you change the name of your application .so file in the Android.mk file, | ||
// make sure you update the name here as well. | ||
SoLoader.loadLibrary("reactnativetemplatews_appmodules"); | ||
sIsSoLibraryLoaded = true; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure thread safety when modifying sIsSoLibraryLoaded
.
The method maybeLoadOtherSoLibraries
modifies the static variable sIsSoLibraryLoaded
within a synchronized block, which is good for thread safety. However, ensure that all other accesses to sIsSoLibraryLoaded
throughout the application are also synchronized or handled in a thread-safe manner to avoid potential race conditions.
The item below with state_pressed="false" and state_focused="false" causes a NullPointerException. | ||
NullPointerException:tempt to invoke virtual method 'android.graphics.drawable.Drawable android.graphics.drawable.Drawable$ConstantState.newDrawable(android.content.res.Resources)' | ||
|
||
<item android:state_pressed="false" android:state_focused="false" android:drawable="@drawable/abc_textfield_default_mtrl_alpha"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove or replace the problematic drawable reference.
The drawable @drawable/abc_textfield_default_mtrl_alpha
referenced in the item with android:state_pressed="false"
and android:state_focused="false"
is known to cause a NullPointerException. Consider removing this item or replacing the drawable reference with one that does not cause issues.
def create_aar_targets(aarfiles): | ||
for aarfile in aarfiles: | ||
name = "aars__" + aarfile[aarfile.rindex("/") + 1:aarfile.rindex(".aar")] | ||
lib_deps.append(":" + name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure that lib_deps
is defined before appending to it, as it could lead to runtime errors if not properly initialized.
def create_jar_targets(jarfiles): | ||
for jarfile in jarfiles: | ||
name = "jars__" + jarfile[jarfile.rindex("/") + 1:jarfile.rindex(".jar")] | ||
lib_deps.append(":" + name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure that lib_deps
is defined before appending to it, as it could lead to runtime errors if not properly initialized.
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@ | |||
); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms', async () => { | |||
it('should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms11', async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a typo in the test description: "1000ms11" should be "1000ms".
- should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms11
+ should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
it('should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms11', async () => { | |
it('should ensure that the navigation service is called after waiting for 1000ms', async () => { |
@@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ | |||
* @param routeName The name of the route to navigate to. Routes are defined in RootScreen using createStackNavigator() | |||
* @param params Route parameters. | |||
*/ | |||
function navigate(routeName, params) { | |||
export function navigate(routeName, params) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The functions navigate
and navigateAndReset
are now correctly exported, but they lack test coverage.
Would you like assistance in creating test cases for these functions?
Also applies to: 42-42
public class MainApplication extends Application implements ReactApplication { | ||
private final ReactNativeHost mReactNativeHost = new ReactNativeHostWrapper( | ||
this, | ||
new ReactNativeHost(this) { | ||
@Override | ||
public boolean getUseDeveloperSupport() { | ||
return BuildConfig.DEBUG; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
protected List<ReactPackage> getPackages() { | ||
@SuppressWarnings("UnnecessaryLocalVariable") | ||
List<ReactPackage> packages = new PackageList(this).getPackages(); | ||
// Packages that cannot be autolinked yet can be added manually here, for example: | ||
// packages.add(new MyReactNativePackage()); | ||
return packages; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
protected String getJSMainModuleName() { | ||
return "index"; | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
private final ReactNativeHost mNewArchitectureNativeHost = | ||
new ReactNativeHostWrapper(this, new MainApplicationReactNativeHost(this)); | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public ReactNativeHost getReactNativeHost() { | ||
if (BuildConfig.IS_NEW_ARCHITECTURE_ENABLED) { | ||
return mNewArchitectureNativeHost; | ||
} else { | ||
return mReactNativeHost; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void onCreate() { | ||
super.onCreate(); | ||
// If you opted-in for the New Architecture, we enable the TurboModule system | ||
ReactFeatureFlags.useTurboModules = BuildConfig.IS_NEW_ARCHITECTURE_ENABLED; | ||
SoLoader.init(this, /* native exopackage */ false); | ||
|
||
initializeFlipper(this, getReactNativeHost().getReactInstanceManager()); | ||
ApplicationLifecycleDispatcher.onApplicationCreate(this); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Review Summary
Subject: Verification of React Native Hosts Configuration and Flipper Initialization
The configuration of React Native hosts in both MainApplication.java
and newarchitecture/MainApplicationReactNativeHost.java
appears to be correctly implemented. Each class provides a tailored setup for handling React packages, JS modules, and developer support flags, which are crucial for the app's operation in different build configurations.
Regarding the initialization of Flipper, it is done in the onCreate()
method of MainApplication.java
. The context provided does not show a direct check against BuildConfig.DEBUG
for initializing Flipper, which is typically expected to ensure that Flipper is only active in debug builds. This might be an area to consider revising for ensuring that Flipper is not included in production builds, depending on the project's configuration management.
Action Required:
- It is recommended to ensure that Flipper initialization is wrapped with a debug condition check (
BuildConfig.DEBUG
) to prevent its inclusion in production builds.
Analysis chain
Review the configuration and initialization of React Native hosts and Flipper.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the React Native hosts are configured correctly and that Flipper is initialized only in debug mode.
rg --files-with-matches 'ReactNativeHost' android/app/src/main/java/com/wednesdaysolutions/rntws/
rg --files-with-matches 'initializeFlipper' android/app/src/main/java/com/wednesdaysolutions/rntws/
Length of output: 456
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the presence of BuildConfig.DEBUG in the condition for initializing Flipper
rg 'initializeFlipper\(this, getReactNativeHost\(\).getReactInstanceManager\(\)\);' android/app/src/main/java/com/wednesdaysolutions/rntws/MainApplication.java -C 5
# Verify the configuration of ReactNativeHost in newarchitecture/MainApplicationReactNativeHost.java
cat android/app/src/main/java/com/wednesdaysolutions/rntws/newarchitecture/MainApplicationReactNativeHost.java
Length of output: 5857
265b67d
to
5a934b1
Compare
5a934b1
to
451b0fe
Compare
Coverage report
Show new covered files 🐣
Test suite run success48 tests passing in 20 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from dd9d814 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ | |||
/** | |||
* This function is called when the RootScreen is created to set the navigator instance to use. | |||
*/ | |||
function setTopLevelNavigator(navigatorRef) { | |||
export function setTopLevelNavigator(navigatorRef) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Review Summary
The review comment concerns the export of the setTopLevelNavigator
function from the app/services/navigationService.js
file and emphasizes the need for unit test coverage for this function.
Analysis of Shell Script Output
The output from the executed shell script intended to find test files covering setTopLevelNavigator
shows results from app/scenes/RootScreen/tests/saga.test.js
and mentions of the function in app/services/navigationService.js
. However, the output does not clearly indicate that setTopLevelNavigator
is directly tested or referenced within any test specifications (test
or spec
). The results from saga.test.js
seem unrelated to direct testing of setTopLevelNavigator
, as they involve different imports and functionality.
Conclusion
Given the output, there is no clear evidence of unit tests that directly cover the setTopLevelNavigator
function. This aligns with the initial review comment's suggestion to ensure that this function is covered by unit tests.
Actionable Directive
Ensure Unit Test Coverage for setTopLevelNavigator
The verification process has revealed that there is no direct unit test coverage for the setTopLevelNavigator
function in app/services/navigationService.js
. It is recommended to implement specific unit tests to verify the functionality and robustness of this function, ensuring that it behaves as expected under various conditions.
Analysis chain
Export of setTopLevelNavigator
. Ensure that this function is covered by unit tests.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering `setTopLevelNavigator`.
rg --type js "setTopLevelNavigator" --files-with-matches | xargs rg "test|spec"
Length of output: 588
Coverage report
Test suite run success48 tests passing in 20 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 21153ad |
acab901
to
a7610b8
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1 similar comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
a7610b8
to
21153ad
Compare
Ticket Link
Related Links
Description
Steps to Reproduce / Test
GIF's
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
.gitignore
files to ignore more items.Refactor
Tests
Chores