feat: Added Tests for services #87
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances the app's navigation capabilities by introducing tests for new functions within the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (4)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional comments not posted (9)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Coverage report
Test suite run success52 tests passing in 24 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 3f66ccb |
|
Analysis Details0 Issues
Coverage and Duplications
Project ID: wednesday-solutions_react-native-template_AY7hdnRSB2n8RRmGoU2M |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| it('dispatches navigation action with the correct routeName and params', () => { | ||
| const routeName = '/test'; | ||
| const params = { screen: 'MainScreen' }; | ||
| NavigationActions.navigate.mockReturnValueOnce({ | ||
| type: 'NAVIGATE_ACTION', | ||
| payload: { routeName, params } | ||
| }); | ||
| navigate(routeName, params); | ||
| expect(NavigationActions.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ | ||
| routeName, | ||
| params | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(navigatorRef.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ | ||
| type: 'NAVIGATE_ACTION', | ||
| payload: { routeName, params } | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Review Summary
The review comment asked to ensure that the mocked navigate function and the navigatorRef.dispatch method are called with the correct parameters in the navigate.test.js file.
Verification Process and Findings
-
Verification of
navigatefunction call:- The
navigatefunction is indeed called with the parametersrouteNameandparamsas shown in the test file snippet and confirmed by the script output. This matches the expected behavior described in the review comment.
- The
-
Verification of
navigatorRef.dispatchmethod call:- The script aimed to verify the call to
navigatorRef.dispatchdid not return any results. This suggests that there might be an issue with the method call or its presence in the codebase as expected.
- The script aimed to verify the call to
Conclusion
The navigate function call is verified and behaves as expected. However, there is an issue with the navigatorRef.dispatch method call, as it does not appear in the expected context. This needs further investigation or correction in the codebase.
Analysis chain
Ensure that the mocked navigate function is called with the correct parameters and that the dispatch method of navigatorRef is invoked as expected.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the navigate function and navigatorRef.dispatch are called with the correct parameters.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'navigate($_, $_)'
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'navigatorRef.dispatch($_)'
Length of output: 198
Ticket Link
Related Links
Description
Steps to Reproduce / Test
GIF's
Summary by CodeRabbit