Unspecific enzyme searches #90
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
At the PSM- and peptide-levels, there should be no difference for mokapot between a unspecific enzyme search and those using an enzyme like trypsin. However, the protein-level is a little more complicated. Mokapot uses the "picked-protein approach" to perform protein-level confidence estimation. Part of this process involves determining the unique and shared possible peptides for every protein the FASTA file, not only those that were detected. Proteins with proper subsets of peptides are grouped and only unique peptides are used for the remaining. There are two complications this can cause in the case of a nonspecific enzyme search:
That being said, these concerns are merely theoretical: I've never actually attempted running mokapot on a non-specific enzyme dataset, so I'm curious how it will perform! To actually run mokapot on a non-specific enzyme dataset from the command line run:
Also make sure to match the other digestion parameters to those used during your search. My advice would be, if you try it, use a FASTA file that includes only canonical sequences, not isoforms. Also, please let me know how it goes! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A rather naïve question: how much effort would it be to support unspecific enzyme searches, such as those used in immunopeptidomics experiments? Is it a matter of parameter tweaks or something larger? Any plans to support this type of workflow?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions