Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protobuf general update #1175

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AlessandroBono
Copy link
Contributor

Marked as Draft since the build of protobuf-c 1.5.0 still fails. See protobuf-c/protobuf-c#698

@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono marked this pull request as draft December 13, 2023 17:42
@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono force-pushed the wip/abono/protobuf branch 2 times, most recently from 4db5a4d to 5ca21b1 Compare December 13, 2023 18:22
@AlessandroBono
Copy link
Contributor Author

I worked around the issue about the missing Config.cmake.in file by including it here. However the compilation via cmake still fails.

@AlessandroBono
Copy link
Contributor Author

The compilation is failing due to protobuf-c/protobuf-c#699

@nacho
Copy link
Contributor

nacho commented Dec 18, 2023

@AlessandroBono is this ready?

@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono force-pushed the wip/abono/protobuf branch 2 times, most recently from 2cb6fe1 to 3a29d2b Compare December 18, 2023 13:19
@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 08:33
@AlessandroBono
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlessandroBono is this ready?

Yes this is ready.

@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono changed the title Draft: Protobuf general update Protobuf general update Dec 3, 2024
Add abseil-cpp as a dependency. It is required since version 22.0 (aka 3.22.0)[1]

[1] protocolbuffers/protobuf@a9f1ea6
Add abseil-cpp as a dependency since it is now required. Furthermore:
 - add Config.cmake.in file[1] because it is missing from the tarball;
 - add a proposed patch[2] to fix the build with cmake.

[1] protobuf-c/protobuf-c#698
[2] protobuf-c/protobuf-c#699
@nacho
Copy link
Contributor

nacho commented Dec 4, 2024

Nice! do you have a PR for the patch you made for protobuf-c?

@AlessandroBono
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice! do you have a PR for the patch you made for protobuf-c?

Yes:
protobuf-c/protobuf-c#699
protobuf-c/protobuf-c#700

@nacho nacho merged commit db4eb9d into wingtk:main Dec 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@AlessandroBono AlessandroBono deleted the wip/abono/protobuf branch January 2, 2025 10:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants