Move SCIM attributes from core schema to user schema

[amanda-ariyaratne]

Proposed changes in this pull request

urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:core:2.0:User:phoneNumbers.fax and urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:core:2.0:User:phoneNumbers.fax are incorrectly placed under the urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:core:2.0 dialect.

This PR moves them to the urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:core:2.0:User schema.

Related Issues

• Revamp SCIM schemas in IS product-is#20850

When should this PR be merged

[Please describe any preconditions that need to be addressed before we
can merge this pull request.]

Follow up actions

[List any possible follow-up actions here; for instance, testing data
migrations, software that we need to install on staging and production
environments.]

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

• Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
• Is the PR labeled correctly?

Functionality

• Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
• Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

• Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
• Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
• Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

• Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
• If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place? There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
• If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature? has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Security

• Confirm this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets.
• Are all UI and API inputs run through forms or serializers?
• Are all external inputs validated and sanitized appropriately?
• Does all branching logic have a default case?
• Does this solution handle outliers and edge cases gracefully?
• Are all external communications secured and restricted to SSL?

Documentation

• Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes should be documented.
• Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented.
• Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11930199575

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.26%. Comparing base (1cdd6a5) to head (f3bc7dc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6140      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     41.40%   41.26%   -0.15%     
+ Complexity    15051    14816     -235     
============================================
  Files          1775     1775              
  Lines        121747   119169    -2578     
  Branches      20284    19927     -357     
============================================
- Hits          50414    49178    -1236     
+ Misses        63849    62612    -1237     
+ Partials       7484     7379     -105     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	25.61% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11930199575
Status: failure

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/12237243974

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/12237243974
Status: success

[jenkins-is-staging]

Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/12237243974