Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ensure consistent hash for operations #1367

Conversation

StarpTech
Copy link
Contributor

@StarpTech StarpTech commented Nov 13, 2024

Checklist

  • I have discussed my proposed changes in an issue and have received approval to proceed.
  • I have followed the coding standards of the project.
  • Tests or benchmarks have been added or updated.
  • Documentation has been updated on https://github.com/wundergraph/cosmo-docs.
  • I have read the Contributors Guide.

FIXES ENG-6013

@JivusAyrus JivusAyrus marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2024 08:24
@StarpTech StarpTech changed the title chore: add failing test for content normalization hashes feat: make operation hash more reliable in variable usage scenarios Nov 28, 2024
@StarpTech StarpTech changed the title feat: make operation hash more reliable in variable usage scenarios feat: make operation hashing more reliable in variable usage scenarios Nov 28, 2024
StarpTech and others added 6 commits November 28, 2024 19:32
…rent-normalized' and 'main' of github.com:wundergraph/cosmo into dustin/eng-5934-queries-with-inline-variable-values-arent-normalized
@StarpTech StarpTech changed the title feat: make operation hashing more reliable in variable usage scenarios feat: ensure consistent hash for operations Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Noroth Noroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nits

router-tests/normalization_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
router-tests/normalization_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JivusAyrus JivusAyrus merged commit 9e516e4 into main Dec 11, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants