Libbpf update #156
Open
Libbpf update #156
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Newer versions of libbpf link against zlib, so also add -lz to the linker flags when compiling userspace programs, and add zlib to the list of packages to install in setup_dependencies.org. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
…le() Newer versions of libbpf deprecated bpf_program__title(), so change all uses to bpf_program__section_name() to silence the warning. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
|
Hmm, going through a bunch of old issues, it seems that we may end up with issues using iproute2 as the loader, so maybe we should hold off on this until that is updated to use libbpf - or just switch over to recommending xdp-tools. Anyway, I think it's better to just do the minimal here for now... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the minimum conversion needed to update libbpf (as suggested in #155); should we keep it at this, or also port the map definitions to new-style BTF while we're at it?
@netoptimizer WDYT?