Updated

content/posts/bluebuild-workshop/index.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ tags: ["uBlue", "Distro", "Bluefin", "Fedora", "Atomic", "Builder", "Linux"]
 
 {{< github repo="blue-build/workshop" >}}
 
-All images will be based off of **Fedora** and have **Atomic** elements. No **Debian** or **ArchLinux** bases as of the writing of this post. Also this project is totally unrealted to **uBlue** or **Bluefin**.
+All images will be based off of **Fedora** and have **Atomic** elements. No **Debian** or **ArchLinux** bases as of the writing of this post. Maybe in the future? Also this project is totally unrealted to **uBlue** or **Bluefin**.
 
 ### Why use it?
 
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Just keep in mind that This isn't a *distro builder*, just a custom image builde
 
 - **The Benefits**
 
-Now I don't know how to put this, but you can do so much with this thing. As to benefits, I can't say much beyond what I already have. With the right amount of **Linux** knowledge you can take it to another level. You can build images that rival the likes of **Bluefin** and its derivatives, even **CachyOS** to a certain degree using just images no ISOs to maintain, set it n forget it style. It's all up to you & your level of knowledge.
+Now I don't know how to put this, but you can do so much with this thing. As to benefits, I can't say much beyond what I already have. With the right amount of **Linux** knowledge you can take it to another level. You can build images that rival the likes of **Bluefin** and its derivatives to a certain degree using just images no ISOs to maintain, set it n forget it style. It's all up to you & your level of knowledge.
 
 ![bluebuild](https://i.imgur.com/4Vs4Yoq.png)
 
@@ -35,13 +35,15 @@ This project is still young, so it will naturally come with some growing pains.
 
 ### My thoughts on BlueBuild
 
-At first glance it looks easy enough to pull off a custom build. But after digging deeper, as I always do, it's not all as straightforward as I'd hoped. You will hit a few snags, which I find natural with every **FOSS** project.
+At first glance it looks easy enough to pull off a custom build. But after digging deeper, as I always do, it's not all as straightforward as I'd hoped. You will hit a few snags, which I find natural with every relatively new **FOSS** project.
 
-One example being, dependencies. I keep running into this problem over and over and over. I am not giving up though. It's just a side project am working on.
+One example being, dependencies. I keep running into this problem over and over and over. Hower it's unrelated to the project, it's just Fedora being Fedora. Sitll a newcomer will not be able to differentiate. I am not giving up though.
 
-Bottom line is, although devs are doing their best to make the project as easy as possible to use, sometimes issues happen that require a lot of Linux know-how to figure out. So as easy as it appears to be, it really isn't as I first thought.
+Bottom line is, although devs are doing their best to make the project as easy as possible to use, sometimes issues happen outside project itself that require a lot of Linux know-how to troubleshoot. So as easy as it appears to be, it really isn't as I first thought.
 
-I still love the project so should you if you like stuff like that. That's why I will keep a close eye on it and see where it goes. I have super high hopes for it. As an Arch user, and ex-Distro maintainer, I see many images being born using this down the line...
+One idea would be to have some sort of error logs for the modules would be interesting. Like, **BlueBuild** sees that the command failed and provides some pointers or something like that. (Thanks **@tulip** for suggestion) which would make it it easier to debug.
+
+I still love the project though, and so should you if you like stuff like that. That's why I will keep a close eye on it and see where it goes. I have super high hopes for it. As an Arch user, and ex-Distro maintainer, I see many images being born using this down the line...
 
 That’s it folks ..
 

public/posts/bluebuild-workshop/index.html

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
     "keywords": ["uBlue","Distro","Bluefin","Fedora","Atomic","Builder","Linux"],
 
     "mainEntityOfPage": "true",
-    "wordCount": "569"
+    "wordCount": "633"
   }]
   </script>
 
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ <h3 class="relative group">What is BlueBuild Workshop?
       .catch(error => console.error(error))
   </script>
 </a>
-<p>All images will be based off of <strong>Fedora</strong> and have <strong>Atomic</strong> elements. No <strong>Debian</strong> or <strong>ArchLinux</strong> bases as of the writing of this post. Also this project is totally unrealted to <strong>uBlue</strong> or <strong>Bluefin</strong>.</p>
+<p>All images will be based off of <strong>Fedora</strong> and have <strong>Atomic</strong> elements. No <strong>Debian</strong> or <strong>ArchLinux</strong> bases as of the writing of this post. Maybe in the future? Also this project is totally unrealted to <strong>uBlue</strong> or <strong>Bluefin</strong>.</p>
 
 
 <h3 class="relative group">Why use it? 
@@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ <h3 class="relative group">Benefits vs Drawbacks
 <ul>
 <li><strong>The Benefits</strong></li>
 </ul>
-<p>Now I don&rsquo;t know how to put this, but you can do so much with this thing. As to benefits, I can&rsquo;t say much beyond what I already have. With the right amount of <strong>Linux</strong> knowledge you can take it to another level. You can build images that rival the likes of <strong>Bluefin</strong> and its derivatives, even <strong>CachyOS</strong> to a certain degree using just images no ISOs to maintain, set it n forget it style. It&rsquo;s all up to you &amp; your level of knowledge.</p>
+<p>Now I don&rsquo;t know how to put this, but you can do so much with this thing. As to benefits, I can&rsquo;t say much beyond what I already have. With the right amount of <strong>Linux</strong> knowledge you can take it to another level. You can build images that rival the likes of <strong>Bluefin</strong> and its derivatives to a certain degree using just images no ISOs to maintain, set it n forget it style. It&rsquo;s all up to you &amp; your level of knowledge.</p>
 <p>
   <figure>
     <img class="my-0 rounded-md" loading="lazy" src="https://i.imgur.com/4Vs4Yoq.png" alt="bluebuild" />
@@ -1691,10 +1691,11 @@ <h3 class="relative group">My thoughts on BlueBuild
     </span>        
 
 </h3>
-<p>At first glance it looks easy enough to pull off a custom build. But after digging deeper, as I always do, it&rsquo;s not all as straightforward as I&rsquo;d hoped. You will hit a few snags, which I find natural with every <strong>FOSS</strong> project.</p>
-<p>One example being, dependencies. I keep running into this problem over and over and over. I am not giving up though. It&rsquo;s just a side project am working on.</p>
-<p>Bottom line is, although devs are doing their best to make the project as easy as possible to use, sometimes issues happen that require a lot of Linux know-how to figure out. So as easy as it appears to be, it really isn&rsquo;t as I first thought.</p>
-<p>I still love the project so should you if you like stuff like that. That&rsquo;s why I will keep a close eye on it and see where it goes. I have super high hopes for it. As an Arch user, and ex-Distro maintainer, I see many images being born using this down the line&hellip;</p>
+<p>At first glance it looks easy enough to pull off a custom build. But after digging deeper, as I always do, it&rsquo;s not all as straightforward as I&rsquo;d hoped. You will hit a few snags, which I find natural with every relatively new <strong>FOSS</strong> project.</p>
+<p>One example being, dependencies. I keep running into this problem over and over and over. Hower it&rsquo;s unrelated to the project, it&rsquo;s just Fedora being Fedora. Sitll a newcomer will not be able to differentiate. I am not giving up though.</p>
+<p>Bottom line is, although devs are doing their best to make the project as easy as possible to use, sometimes issues happen outside project itself that require a lot of Linux know-how to troubleshoot. So as easy as it appears to be, it really isn&rsquo;t as I first thought.</p>
+<p>One idea would be to have some sort of error logs for the modules would be interesting. Like, <strong>BlueBuild</strong> sees that the command failed and provides some pointers or something like that. (Thanks <strong>@tulip</strong> for suggestion) which would make it it easier to debug.</p>
+<p>I still love the project though, and so should you if you like stuff like that. That&rsquo;s why I will keep a close eye on it and see where it goes. I have super high hopes for it. As an Arch user, and ex-Distro maintainer, I see many images being born using this down the line&hellip;</p>
 <p>That’s it folks ..</p>
 <p>Cheers !</p>