-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For #939: Upgrade to Junit 5 #1015
Conversation
Job #1015 is now in scope, role is |
This pull request #1015 is assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @krzyk/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job |
@krzyk PLease take a look, 0crat assigned me my own PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso please see my comments
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-api</artifactId> | ||
<version>5.3.1</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso this should be a test scope
pom.xml
Outdated
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId> | ||
<version>5.1.0</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso 5.3.1
junit4 tags. | ||
--> | ||
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso you also need to upgrade surefire and failsafe to the newest versions, right now they are taken from jcabi-parent
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ public void passesCorrectFilesWithNoExceptions() throws Exception { | |||
* @throws Exception If something wrong happens inside | |||
*/ | |||
@Ignore | |||
@Test(expected = ValidationException.class) | |||
@org.junit.Test(expected = ValidationException.class) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso this should be from jupiter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@krzyk I've not changed all tags from Jnit 4, as it would take way more than 30 min. I've left those expected
tags to be fixed later in the @todo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@krzyk Take a look at the comment please
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ public void passesCorrectFilesWithNoExceptions() throws Exception { | |||
* @throws Exception If something wrong happens inside | |||
*/ | |||
@Ignore | |||
@Test(expected = ValidationException.class) | |||
@org.junit.Test(expected = ValidationException.class) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@krzyk I've not changed all tags from Jnit 4, as it would take way more than 30 min. I've left those expected
tags to be fixed later in the @todo
@paulodamaso OK, but the build fails now. |
@krzyk I'll take a look, thanks |
@krzyk Please take a look |
@rultor merge |
@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @paulodamaso/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
The job #1015 is now out of scope |
@paulodamaso Here again - wrong assignment :) I have to mark it as bad. Ok? |
@ypshenychka Yeah, please, these self-assigned tasks are bothering me because they take space im my agenda |
@paulodamaso I believe ARC can reassign it manually. Or we don't have any other REVs here? |
@0crat quality bad |
Quality is low, no payment, see §31 |
@ypshenychka unfortunately there are no REVs her |
@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment |
Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z |
For #939: Upgrade to Junit 5
@Test
annotation with Junit5@Test
@Ignore
annotation with Junit5@Disabled