SP-GiST support

[zachasme]

Replaces #7. Part of #5.

I have closed the old PR which contained code for both GiST and SP-GiST, splitting it into two separate PRs.

Currently the tests do not pass, and work is focused GiST, see #42.

[BielStela]

Hi! First and foremost, thank you for doing all this! It is really nice to have h3 integration in postgres :). I've been wondering that the h3 index structure fits perfectly the sp-gist indexes and found this PR. I tried to rebase this branch so it has the latest updates in main to give it a try and work on it. But it is a bit hell of a rebase 😁 and don't think I'm familiarized enough with your code to make it correctly.
I feel weird asking you to rebase this so I can play around with the sp-gist thing (without any success I'm afraid) but it would be awesome if so happens! Thank you!

[zachasme]

Hi @BielStela! Any help on this is appreciated, I've gone ahead and rebased the branch on main.

You should be able to run the tests using the script at scripts/develop, and I've put some preliminary tests in h3/test/sql/opclass_spgist.sql.

As far as I can tell the last test query is currently crashing the server.

[BielStela]

Hi, @zachasme, I managed to pass all the test by finding that the line

h3-pg/h3/src/opclass_spgist.c

Line 294 in e8aae9e

*parent = DatumGetH3Index(in->prefixDatum);

was the one causing the segfault. I removed the pointer definition and fixed pass by reference here and there of parent and test pass smoothly. The issue is that the index is as slow a not having the index so I think some deeper tweaks in the implementation are needed. I'm learning all this on the way so don't expect amazing news anytime soon 😬

[zachasme]

Thank you for the fix!

Yes, I'm afraid the current branch is simply the result of me smashing something together that can run on a PostgreSQL server.

The next (big) step is figuring out how to best implement picksplit and choose, such that the implementation is both correct and performant.

May I ask how you tested that the index is as slow as not having the index?