kconfig: Add dt_compat_any_not_has_prop function

[decsny]

Add preprocessor function that returns 'y' if any enabled node with compat does NOT have a certain property. This is different from using dt_compat_any_has_prop to check that they ALL don't have the property.

[henrikbrixandersen]

I find dt_compat_any_not_has_prop difficult to read. How about something like dt_compat_not_all_has_prop?

[decsny]

I find dt_compat_any_not_has_prop difficult to read. How about something like dt_compat_not_all_has_prop?

another option I was considering is to use the dt_compat_any_has_prop function and add a fourth boolean parameter to "invert" the logic? thoughts?

[henrikbrixandersen]

I find dt_compat_any_not_has_prop difficult to read. How about something like dt_compat_not_all_has_prop?

another option I was considering is to use the dt_compat_any_has_prop function and add a fourth boolean parameter to "invert" the logic? thoughts?

I'd prefer separate functions instead of breaking the existing API.

[decsny]

I find dt_compat_any_not_has_prop difficult to read. How about something like dt_compat_not_all_has_prop?

another option I was considering is to use the dt_compat_any_has_prop function and add a fourth boolean parameter to "invert" the logic? thoughts?

I'd prefer separate functions instead of breaking the existing API.

How would that break the existing API? We have done something like this multiple times in the past with these kconfig functions by adding another optional parameter

[henrikbrixandersen]

I find dt_compat_any_not_has_prop difficult to read. How about something like dt_compat_not_all_has_prop?

another option I was considering is to use the dt_compat_any_has_prop function and add a fourth boolean parameter to "invert" the logic? thoughts?

I'd prefer separate functions instead of breaking the existing API.

How would that break the existing API? We have done something like this multiple times in the past with these kconfig functions by adding another optional parameter

An optional parameter is something else. You didn't say "optional" in your original comment.