AP_Scripting: add ROMFS to lua path #26157
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows
require
to find modules in ROMFS. Possibly helps with other file system methods too. Note that this adds the new search path even if we don't have ROMFS compiled in. I think it will be fine, but I have not tested.Adding
"./modules/?.lua;" "./modules/?/init.lua"
to get to the same place relative to a script loaded in ROMFS does not seem to work, I'm not sure why.This should allow a SD card script to require something from ROMFS, which using relative paths would not. Because of the ordering it should also mean a SD card version of the same file gets priority over a ROMFS copy. Its convenient for development but might give users a very exciting way to break stuff. We could swap the ordering so ROMFS takes priority. Again, I have not tested this.