Remove re-defines from various hwdef files #26597
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
peterbarker
force-pushed
the
pr/hwdef-linting
branch
from
725196d to
2802b2e
Compare
another regex problem
…p level with same value
these either come from includes are duplicated in these files
peterbarker
force-pushed
the
pr/hwdef-linting
branch
from
2802b2e to
c8ae2a0
Compare
|
All of these defines are redundant because of include or re-definition in the same file. I've run this through size_compare_branches.py and it's only the SITL boards which are not binary-output-identical. |
tridge
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... and correct
intdefinesextraction, again.