-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove dutch_waterways model #1403
Conversation
@Jingru923 was this the only part that was "broken" about 2024.7.0? If so, I wouldn't say the release itself is bad, and there is no need for a quick 2024.7.1. |
I would have to be done manual then. |
If that's not too much extra work, a manual action would be great. Should we update the release docs to manually trigger TeamCity builds on the version bump PRs like #1402? Or can we trigger it automatically if the branch name begins with |
I will take a look later today
You mean to avoid situations like this? |
Thanks, that'd be great. Indeed it is a bit annoying, but if there is any time that TeamCity should be green, it is when doing a release. This time it caught something harmless but the test surface is larger on TeamCity, and cleaning up broken releases is also not fun. Otherwise we'd need to only do releases first thing in the morning after a green nightly. |
Fair enough, wanna open an issue for that? |
One alternative approach: maybe we should only publish PyPI packages after the GitHub release is done? |
This would help, but that would still give us broken tags right? Just not broken Python releases, and possibly Ribasim tags that won't get Python releases. I'll make an issue. |
As discussed with @gijsber, this model is not worth maintaining and it broke with #1393.