Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid unconstrained sections in allocation networks #1429

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

SouthEndMusic
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #1208.

I fixed the UserDemand point more generally: no sources other than the main network should be available when collecting subnetwork demands. We do allow multiple inlets from the main network to a subnetwork. We do not test this yet, but this also allows for insufficiently constraint distribution of the subnetwork demands over these inlets. A preference ordering over sources (#565) could resolve this.

@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as draft April 25, 2024 14:07
@SouthEndMusic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Brainstorm:

61adfa53-ae94-49df-bb81-7ab17b818ebd

@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2024 11:24
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic requested a review from visr April 29, 2024 12:05
@visr visr merged commit 6c4626d into main Apr 29, 2024
24 checks passed
@visr visr deleted the remove_unconstrained_sections branch April 29, 2024 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Avoid unconstrained sections in allocation networks
2 participants