Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate 'Policy.js' lib to TypeScript #33691

Merged

Conversation

cdOut
Copy link
Contributor

@cdOut cdOut commented Dec 28, 2023

Details

Migration of Policy.js to TypeScript.

Fixed Issues

$ #24918

Tests

Policy.js that is being migrated here is responsible for everything related to workspaces, so please click through all flows related with it as a test check.

  1. Log in and create a new workspace.
  2. Go into the workspace, click through and test every flow that is related to the workspace.
  3. In settings change the name, unit and rate, you can also test updating the avatar and then clearing it.
  4. Invite new members with a specific message, check that it sent the correct message to user.
  5. Try to connect a bank account, make sure it works properly.
  6. After trying every flow related to the workspace, remove it and confirm that it was deleted successfully.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Policy.js that is being migrated here is responsible for everything related to workspaces, so please click through all flows related with it as a test check.

  1. Log in and create a new workspace.
  2. Go into the workspace, click through and test every flow that is related to the workspace.
  3. In settings change the name, unit and rate, you can also test updating the avatar and then clearing it.
  4. Invite new members with a specific message, check that it sent the correct message to user.
  5. Try to connect a bank account, make sure it works properly.
  6. After trying every flow related to the workspace, remove it and confirm that it was deleted successfully.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
ANDROID-NATIVE.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
ANDROID-CHROME.mov
iOS: Native
IOS-NATIVE.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
IOS-SAFARI.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CHROME.mov
MacOS: Desktop
DESKTOP.mov

src/libs/PersonalDetailsUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/PersonalDetailsUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@cdOut Conflicts 😅 Let us know once it's ready for re-review

Copy link
Contributor

@kubabutkiewicz kubabutkiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor comments, rest looks good 👍

src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from alitoshmatov January 10, 2024 10:48
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024

@alitoshmatov Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@alitoshmatov
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
policy-android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
policy-mweb.mov
iOS: Native
policy-ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
policy-safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
policy-web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
policy-desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@alitoshmatov alitoshmatov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from roryabraham January 10, 2024 15:58
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Try to re-review this PR yourself and check for a few things:

  • Use finallyData to DRY up any overlaps between successData and failureData
  • Make sure any types have descriptive names that capture what they actually are
  • question whether optional fields really should be optional

src/libs/PersonalDetailsUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
unit: Unit;
};

type NewCustomUnit = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should not need separate types for CustomUnit and NewCustomUnit.

Furthermore, It's pretty sus that all the fields of both would be optional.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did check which fields should be required and updated it accordingly. I have a very limited leeway when handing types here due to how values are passed in the updateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRate and saveUnitAndRate. I did manage to remove the other type, it still isn't perfect but that's the best we can achieve without changing the logic and value passed to the functions mentioned above. Please check whether current implementation is okay.

@cdOut
Copy link
Contributor Author

cdOut commented Jan 11, 2024

cc: @roryabraham

I re-reviewed and applied your suggestions, please check it again.

src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
makeMeAdmin?: boolean;

/** Pending fields for the policy */
pendingFields?: Record<string, unknown>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should instead use OnyxCommon.PendingFields, ideally including only the fields that can be pending, for example like pendingFields?: OnyxCommon.PendingFields<'avatar' | 'employeeList>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should make this change here, but I also brought this topic up for further discussion here

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case to get ts passing I had to change this to:

pendingFields?: OnyxCommon.PendingFields<'addWorkspaceRoom' & 'avatar' & 'generalSettings'>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roryabraham 'addWorkspaceRoom' & 'avatar' & 'generalSettings' type equals never, so it's not ideal. I agree that we should define pendingFields better, moving to the slack discussion.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We still could have changed this to be just OnyxCommon.PendingFields, but I'll treat this as NAB since we have a follow-up issue in place

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Also we have conflicts here

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Back to you @roryabraham!

Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍🏼

makeMeAdmin?: boolean;

/** Pending fields for the policy */
pendingFields?: Record<string, unknown>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We still could have changed this to be just OnyxCommon.PendingFields, but I'll treat this as NAB since we have a follow-up issue in place

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 7dfbddc into Expensify:main Jan 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.27-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.27-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants