Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: attachment menu position #52021

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

teneeto
Copy link
Contributor

@teneeto teneeto commented Nov 5, 2024

Details

This PR fixes the contextMenuActions position i.e the report actions attachment menu position.

Fixed Issues

$ #50818
PROPOSAL: #50818

Tests

  1. Login into any account
  2. Navigate to any 1:1 DM
  3. Send any video/image attachment
  4. Send another video/image attachment
  5. Hover over the first image/video attachment and click on the "..." button
  6. While the context menu of the first attachment is still open, Hover over the second image/video attachment and click on the "..." button.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Login into any account
  2. Navigate to any 1:1 DM
  3. Send any video/image attachment
  4. Send another video/image attachment
  5. Hover over the first image/video attachment and click on the "..." button
  6. While the context menu of the first attachment is still open, Hover over the second image/video attachment and click on the "..." button.

QA Steps

  1. Login into any account
  2. Navigate to any 1:1 DM
  3. Send any video/image attachment
  4. Send another video/image attachment
  5. Hover over the first image/video attachment and click on the "..." button
  6. While the context menu of the first attachment is still open, Hover over the second image/video attachment and click on the "..." button.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-14.at.05.51.47.mov
Android: Native
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@teneeto teneeto marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 07:51
@teneeto teneeto requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 07:51
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rojiphil and removed request for a team November 6, 2024 07:51
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2024

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ function hideContextMenu(shouldDelay?: boolean, onHideCallback = () => {}) {
return;
}
if (!shouldDelay) {
contextMenuRef.current.hideContextMenu(onHideCallback);

onHideCallback();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@teneeto Thanks for the PR.
Can you please share some information on how this change helps in resolving the issue?
Also, this code has not been changed for quite some time. So, I am curious to know what recent changes could have triggered this issue.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 7, 2024

@teneeto Strange. I can reproduce the problem with the changes in the PR. Here is a test video demonstrating the same. Am I missing something here?

52021-issue-fix-001.mp4

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 8, 2024

Hi @rojiphil, having a look

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 8, 2024

O I see, I Solved for a completely different bug I guess. Let me do a recording to share more info on what I did. I possibly tested for the wrong issue.

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 13, 2024

@rojiphil, so we have this situation whereby once a context menu is already open and you immediately try opening another from any report action item and then try to click on the same action again, the context menu looses it's position and this because the context is called twice. I initially thought I was solving our current issue of focus, however, The current solution solves that issue i just mentioned as described in the record below.

Screen.Recording.2024-11-13.at.08.23.53.mov

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 13, 2024

I'm still trying to wrap up for the videoplayer context menu. Couldn't complete it yesterday, but giving it a try again today.

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 14, 2024

and for that i intend to agree with Shahinyan11's earlier proposal

@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor Author

teneeto commented Nov 14, 2024

@rojiphil can you check again?

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

can you check again?

I just checked again and my initial assessment is that it is fixed now. I will continue with the review and again update later today.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

I am not able to test the play of a video attachment on Web Safari platform. But I don't think our PR is the cause of this. I have raised an issue though in slack here. Once there is clarity on this issue, I will continue with the checklist.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Safari
52021-web-safari-001.mp4
MacOS: Chrome
52021-web-chrome-001.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
52121-desktop-001.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari

Not applicable for this issue

Android: Native

Not applicable for this issue

Android: mWeb Chrome

Not applicable for this issue

iOS: Native

Not applicable for this issue

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @teneeto . Just a NAB request though to add the test case specific to the steps 6,7,8 as mentioned in OP steps for this issue here

@thienlnam Changes LGTM and works well too.
All yours for review. Thanks.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 18, 2024

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #50818 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit 4829ac9 into Expensify:main Nov 18, 2024
18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.64-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

@@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ function hideContextMenu(shouldDelay?: boolean, onHideCallback = () => {}) {
return;
}
if (!shouldDelay) {
contextMenuRef.current.hideContextMenu(onHideCallback);

onHideCallback();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change causes the context menu to stay open on mobile.

Screen.Recording.2024-11-19.at.10.36.51.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @j-piasecki for pointing this out.
@teneeto Let us raise another PR to fix this. I think we can revert this line to the original as it was not required to fix the issue at hand here. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 9.0.64-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants