Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vip-travel] Create Trip Details Screen #52823

Merged

Conversation

blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra commented Nov 20, 2024

Explanation of Change

We're adding a new Trip Details Modal in NewDot, allowing users to view travel details directly in the app instead of being redirected to Spotnana. This includes creating a new page and components to display trip information like flights, hotels, rails and cars seamlessly.

Fixed Issues

$ #37823
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests


To prepare your account and environment for testing, follow these steps:

1. Configure Your Account for Testing

  • Navigate to OldDot (ideally create new account)

  • Run the following JavaScript snippet in the console before enabling travel in the account:

    var settings = NVP.get('travelSettings') || {};
    settings.testAccount = true;
    NVP.set('travelSettings', settings);
  • Verify that the test settings are successfully applied (NVP.get('travelSettings')).

  • Now you can enable travel in the account and proceed with testing (Search -> Trip -> book a trip)

  • Use stripe card ending in 4444 for testing purposes (https://docs.stripe.com/testing)

  • When reserving trips for testing purposes:

    • Always book trips scheduled at least 1 month in the future.
  • Example:

    • Flight: One-way trip from SEA (Seattle) to SFO (San Francisco).
    • Airline: Alaska Airlines.
    • Departure Date: At least 1 month from the current date.

Flight Details

  • Verify the page displays key information: departure/arrival times, duration of the flight, layovers, airline, seat, record locator, and cabin class.
  • Validate clickable actions: Modify trip and Trip support .
  • Ensure responsive design and alignment across devices.

Hotel Details

  • Confirm correct display of hotel name, address, check-in/out times, room type, and cancellation policy.
  • Check clickable actions: Modify trip and Trip support .
  • Verify overall layout for completeness and responsiveness.

Car Rental Details

  • Check the car rental name, pickup/drop-off details, car type, and cancellation policy.
  • Ensure the Modify trip and Trip support options are functional.
  • Validate formatting and responsiveness across devices.

Train/Rail Details

  • Verify the page displays key information: departure/arrival times, duration of the ride, layovers, airline, seat, record locator, and cabin class.
  • Validate clickable actions: Modify trip and Trip support .
  • Ensure responsive design and alignment across devices.

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-web.webm
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari

Nothing here 🤫

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@blazejkustra blazejkustra changed the title Feature/trip details [vip-travel] Create Trip Details Screen Nov 26, 2024
@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor Author

But also why would just opening a link take a long time?

Before opening a link, we make a request to generate signing credentials for travel page, that's why it could potentially take some time. I'm going to include a loading spinner, so it's not confusing when user has a bad internet connection.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Cool - thanks for explaining, that works for me 👍

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, appreciate the explanation! I'm down with including it too in that case 👍

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra Back to you!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Dec 10, 2024

Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 1 25 19 PM

Please add a bottom padding. Unable to access the last button at all.
cc @SzymczakJ

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 4 18 35 PM

Address is getting cut off here.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 4 20 05 PM

Not related to this PR. But the preview is overflowing.

@SzymczakJ
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed your comments @shubham1206agra!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 6 02 19 PM
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 12 10 30 PM
iOS: Native Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 12 56 28 PM
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 11 58 47 AM
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 11 15 56 AM
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 12 45 57 PM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from stitesExpensify December 10, 2024 12:39
@SzymczakJ
Copy link
Contributor

SzymczakJ commented Dec 12, 2024

@blazejkustra told me that he has already confirmed these translation on open-source, but I couldn't find it anywhere. If yes then ignore my comment 😄
Nevertheless bumping this PR!
FYI I'm OOO tomorrow

@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I posted in the translation channel to confirm, I'll post any updates here when I get them

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor Author

but I couldn't find it anywhere.

Slack is confusing as I have two accounts on open source channel, that's why @SzymczakJ couldn't find my messages 😅

These translations were all confirmed in these two threads:

@stitesExpensify So we can move forward 🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fantastic, can't wait for this to go live!

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stitesExpensify Let's ignore Changed files ESLint check, this PR is already too big and in the past we made exceptions like this

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit 8b9bd0e into Expensify:main Dec 18, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

@stitesExpensify looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Not an emergency, this is a very big PR that will continue to have conflicts if we don't move quickly

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants