-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add a few comments and small code fixes in addTransmissibilityCouplingPattern for poromechanics with conforming fractures #3250
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3250 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 55.99% 55.99%
========================================
Files 1053 1053
Lines 89157 89157
========================================
Hits 49921 49921
Misses 39236 39236 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@ryar9534 is it good to merge? |
It should be - Matteo and I were considering waiting and including it in the solution to the import bug once we found it (just to avoid rebaselining multiple times) but lets just go ahead and do it. I will handle the rebaseline when the tests complete |
@ryar9534 This doesn't seem to be passing tests. |
src/coreComponents/physicsSolvers/multiphysics/SinglePhasePoromechanicsConformingFractures.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…CouplingPattern for poromechanics with conforming fractures (#3250) --------- Co-authored-by: Ryan ARONSON (X) <[email protected]>
…CouplingPattern for poromechanics with conforming fractures (#3250) --------- Co-authored-by: Ryan ARONSON (X) <[email protected]>
Adds a missing const and changes a globalIndex to a localIndex, as well as using flow solver discretization name to get stencil.
As it turns out, there was no indexing error.