chore: test util funcs

[estensen]

Test coverage is pretty low. First stab at improving it.

[samlaf]

LGTM. @estensen is this ready for review or were you planning on doing more work here?

@shrimalmadhur wdyt about breaking up this utils dir into more useful named modules (like utils/url_validation or utils/validation)? Also potentially moving this into internal/ to make sure other people don't rely on these functions, such that we can keep refactoring them and moving them around. Unless the CLI is using them?

[shrimalmadhur]

LGTM. @estensen is this ready for review or were you planning on doing more work here?

@shrimalmadhur wdyt about breaking up this utils dir into more useful named modules (like utils/url_validation or utils/validation)? Also potentially moving this into internal/ to make sure other people don't rely on these functions, such that we can keep refactoring them and moving them around. Unless the CLI is using them?

Yes. I think that makes sense. I think CLI should make it's own utils and not rely on sdk for internal utilities. I have changed some already but if I finding anything breaking I will change it in CLI. so ya let's move internal utils to internal and break them down.

[estensen]

LGTM. @estensen is this ready for review or were you planning on doing more work here?

Trying to keep diffs small, so this is it for now. Was planning on continuing to have at least some tests for all functions here to get better test coverage.