-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update result-service.yaml #13
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Service
User->>Service: Request to access service
Service-->>User: Responds with nodePort 31002
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
none |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ spec: | |||
- name: "result-service" | |||
port: 5001 | |||
targetPort: 80 | |||
nodePort: 31001 | |||
nodePort: 31002 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Port 31002 is already in use by vote-service.yaml
. Please choose a different nodePort to avoid conflicts.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify port availability and update related configs.
The change from nodePort: 31001
to nodePort: 31002
looks good. The new port is within the valid range for NodePorts (30000-32767).
Please run the following command to ensure that the new port (31002) is not already in use by another service in the cluster:
If the command returns any service names, it indicates a potential conflict that needs to be resolved.
Don't forget to update any related documentation, deployment scripts, or other configuration files that might reference the old port number (31001).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if port 31002 is already in use
kubectl get services --all-namespaces -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.spec.ports[]?.nodePort==31002) | .metadata.name'
Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any occurrence of nodePort: 31002 in YAML files
rg 'nodePort:\s*31002' --files-with-matches --glob '*.yaml'
Length of output: 137
Summary by CodeRabbit
nodePort
from 31001 to 31002, enhancing accessibility and performance.