-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(docs): touch up trash bin line on docs homepage #14492
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## edge #14492 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.79% 67.79% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 2518 2518
Lines 72004 72003 -1
Branches 9244 9244
==========================================
- Hits 48815 48814 -1
Misses 20987 20987
Partials 2202 2202
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
api/docs/v2/index.rst
Outdated
plate = protocol.load_labware( | ||
"corning_96_wellplate_360ul_flat", location="D1" | ||
) | ||
tiprack = protocol.load_labware( | ||
"opentrons_flex_96_tiprack_200ul", location="D2" | ||
) | ||
trash = protocol.load_trash_bin("A3") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need to use a named location to keep things uniform with the rest of the sample code?
protocol.load_trash_bin(location = "A3")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh yeah, we could
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Making sure about using named locations in code samples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thank you - love the feature branch!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the named positions. LGTM.
* revert 2.17 changes * fix trash line on homepage * named location arg
* revert 2.17 changes * fix trash line on homepage * named location arg
Overview
Follow up to #14455. Fixes syntax and makes the code match the order on the Protocol Examples page.
Also does some housekeeping to set up a feature branch for docs content tied to the PAPI 2.17 release. That will also allow for this change to be deployed immediately.
Test Plan
Changelog
trash
line and properly indent.Review requests
the whole branch management plan seems sound?
Risk assessment
v low. deleting some docs content but it should be preserved in other branches.