Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Live preview message composer (Approach 2) #31731

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

imf-ali
Copy link

@imf-ali imf-ali commented Feb 11, 2024

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Make the message composer live preview feature instead of just adding markdown tokens that styles/parse the message in the Message List.

Here is my proposal

Steps to test or reproduce

The following markdown preview should be enabled -

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Strike
  • Plain Context
  • Line Break
  • Paragraph
  • Link
  • Tasks
  • Code line
  • Color
  • Big Emoji
  • Emoji
  • Inline Code
  • Heading
  • Quote
  • Blockquote
  • Ordered list
  • Unordered list

Current Working

screen-capture.online-video-cutter.com.1.mp4

@imf-ali imf-ali requested a review from a team as a code owner February 11, 2024 06:24
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 11, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c29e562

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@imf-ali imf-ali changed the title new approach for live composer feat: Live preview message composer (Approach 2) Feb 11, 2024
@imf-ali
Copy link
Author

imf-ali commented Feb 11, 2024

Hey @hugocostadev and @tassoevan, can you check this approach if this is going in right direction? Would love your feedback. Its still in progress. This is the modified approach of #30414

@tassoevan
Copy link
Contributor

I couldn't make it work, for some reason.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants