-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CV already published + single LCE #13972
Conversation
trigger: test-robottelo |
PRT requires #13970 to pass (but this PR can be merged before, these are 2 different bugs) |
trigger: test-robottelo |
trigger: test-robottelo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK pending comments and questions!
host_subscription_client, | ||
function_org, | ||
function_lce, | ||
sca_enabled, | ||
): | ||
"""Attempt to enable a repository of a subscription that was not |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should update the description wrt to SCA switch and expected results. Also good to have test name modified for sca switching!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. I'll update :expectedresults:
to reflect what we expect to happen with{,out} SCA.
I wouldn't change the test name though in order to keep history. I think it's descriptive enough as it is.
trigger: test-robottelo |
PRT Result
|
@lhellebr |
trigger: test-robottelo |
PRT Result
|
0ade17a
to
870c0a9
Compare
Reason is stream not supporting non-SCA. I will open a new PR for 6.15 and will remove non-SCA stuff from here. |
6.15 PR: #14181 |
870c0a9
to
b087908
Compare
trigger: test-robottelo |
PRT Result
|
PRT Result
|
PRT Result
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lhellebr Can you please address @Gauravtalreja1's comments in #14181 and make the same changes in this PR?
Gaurav's comments addressed |
trigger: test-robottelo |
CQ failure unrelated:
|
PRT Result
|
…_rh_repo. Also, don't use 2 LCEs needlessly.
Waiting for @JacobCallahan to fix the CQ |
The PR JacobCallahan/ssh2-python#1 was merged yesterday and the CQ is fixed. |
Problem Statement
Fix the test. CV is already published and promoted by setup_org_for_a_rh_repo. Also, don't use 2 LCEs needlessly.