-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add new remake(::AbstractSciMLFunction)
, fix some remake
bugs.
#891
Merged
ChrisRackauckas
merged 13 commits into
SciML:master
from
AayushSabharwal:as/fix-mtk-tests
Dec 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
93bb621
feat: add generic `remake(::AbstractSciMLFunction)`
AayushSabharwal 6c313f8
refactor: use new `remake(::SciMLFunction)` in `remake(::ODEProblem)`
AayushSabharwal c4551dd
refactor: remove old `remake(::Union{SDEFunction, SDDEFunction})`
AayushSabharwal d814e2c
refactor: remove old `remake(::DDEFunction)`
AayushSabharwal 9d05f66
refactor: remove old `remake(::NonlinearFunction)`
AayushSabharwal 14feee9
test: add test to ensure `remake` retains properties of `f` passed to it
AayushSabharwal 723abd7
fix: fix `remake` for split functions
AayushSabharwal c4a4692
feat: add `is_split_function` and `split_function_f_wrapper` traits
AayushSabharwal d04a6eb
fix: better handle split functions in `remake(::AbstractSciMLFunction)`
AayushSabharwal 8b490b8
refactor: format
AayushSabharwal 8e32e90
fix: handle `cache` kwarg of `SplitFunction`/`DynamicalSDEFunction` i…
AayushSabharwal 6d4374c
fix: fix undefined variable in `remake(::ODEProblem)`
AayushSabharwal d455a5a
fix: retain cache in appropriate split functions
AayushSabharwal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn't this just
(;a..., b...)
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, because
nothing
values inb
will override values ina
. This function makes it so that if a key has the valuenothing
inb
, it uses the value froma
.