Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

降低getSSLCtx失败的日志等级 #259

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mtdxc
Copy link
Contributor

@mtdxc mtdxc commented Dec 6, 2024

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


cqm seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review for src/Util/SSLBox.cpp:

Code Review: Patch to src/Util/SSLBox.cpp

Summary

This patch modifies the logging level for a specific error case within the findCertificate function of the SSL_Initor class. It changes the log level from WarnL (warning) to TraceL (trace). This is a patch review.

Detailed Feedback

Code Overview

The patch reduces the logging level when a certificate cannot be found for a given host. The original code logged this as a warning, while the patch changes it to a trace level log. This implies that this event, while noteworthy, is not necessarily indicative of an error condition requiring immediate attention.

Strengths

  • Improved Log Management: Reducing the log level is a good practice for managing log verbosity. Warnings should be reserved for situations that might indicate a problem requiring user intervention or further investigation. If the absence of a specific certificate is expected in some scenarios (e.g., during initial setup or with certain client configurations), then using TraceL is appropriate.

Areas for Improvement

1. Justification and Context

  • Issue: The patch lacks sufficient context or justification for the change. While reducing the log level might seem minor, it's crucial to understand why this change is necessary. Was there an issue with excessive warning logs cluttering the output? Is this a deliberate design choice to only log this event at the trace level for debugging purposes? The commit message should clearly explain the reasoning behind this modification.

  • Suggestion: Add a detailed commit message explaining the rationale for changing the log level. Include information such as:

    • The reason for the change (e.g., too many warnings, expected behavior in certain situations).
    • Any performance implications (though unlikely in this case).
    • Any potential impact on debugging or monitoring.
  • Example: A good commit message might look like this:

    Refactor: Reduce log level for missing certificate in findCertificate
    
    The previous warning log for missing certificates in findCertificate was causing excessive log output in some scenarios where the absence of a specific certificate is expected behavior (e.g., during initial setup or with certain client configurations).  This change reduces the log level to TraceL, making the logs cleaner and easier to manage without impacting the ability to debug certificate-related issues.  This change has no performance impact.
    

2. Potential for Misinterpretation

  • Issue: While the change is technically correct, reducing the log level might mask potential problems. If the absence of a certificate is an error condition in some cases, changing the log level to TraceL could lead to missed errors.

  • Suggestion: Consider whether a more nuanced approach is needed. Perhaps a conditional log level based on a configuration setting or a more specific error message could be used. This would allow for flexibility in logging behavior depending on the context.

  • Example:

    if (ref._log_missing_certs_as_warning) {
        WarnL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost;
    } else {
        TraceL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost;
    }

Conclusion

The patch itself is straightforward and correctly implements the change in log level. However, the lack of context and potential for masking errors are significant concerns. Addressing these issues with a more informative commit message and potentially a more flexible logging mechanism would significantly improve the patch.

TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT

@mtdxc mtdxc closed this Dec 6, 2024
@mtdxc mtdxc deleted the less_ssl_log branch December 6, 2024 02:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants