Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

降低getSSLCtx失败的日志等级 #259

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

降低getSSLCtx失败的日志等级 #259

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions src/Util/SSLBox.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review for src/Util/SSLBox.cpp:

Code Review: Patch to src/Util/SSLBox.cpp

Summary

This patch modifies the logging level for a specific error case within the findCertificate function of the SSL_Initor class. It changes the log level from WarnL (warning) to TraceL (trace). This is a patch review.

Detailed Feedback

Code Overview

The patch reduces the logging level when a certificate cannot be found for a given host. The original code logged this as a warning, while the patch changes it to a trace level log. This implies that this event, while noteworthy, is not necessarily indicative of an error condition requiring immediate attention.

Strengths

  • Improved Log Management: Reducing the log level is a good practice for managing log verbosity. Warnings should be reserved for situations that might indicate a problem requiring user intervention or further investigation. If the absence of a specific certificate is expected in some scenarios (e.g., during initial setup or with certain client configurations), then using TraceL is appropriate.

Areas for Improvement

1. Justification and Context

  • Issue: The patch lacks sufficient context or justification for the change. While reducing the log level might seem minor, it's crucial to understand why this change is necessary. Was there an issue with excessive warning logs cluttering the output? Is this a deliberate design choice to only log this event at the trace level for debugging purposes? The commit message should clearly explain the reasoning behind this modification.

  • Suggestion: Add a detailed commit message explaining the rationale for changing the log level. Include information such as:

    • The reason for the change (e.g., too many warnings, expected behavior in certain situations).
    • Any performance implications (though unlikely in this case).
    • Any potential impact on debugging or monitoring.

  • Example: A good commit message might look like this:

    Refactor: Reduce log level for missing certificate in findCertificate

The previous warning log for missing certificates in findCertificate was causing excessive log output in some scenarios where the absence of a specific certificate is expected behavior (e.g., during initial setup or with certain client configurations).  This change reduces the log level to TraceL, making the logs cleaner and easier to manage without impacting the ability to debug certificate-related issues.  This change has no performance impact.

2. Potential for Misinterpretation

  • Issue: While the change is technically correct, reducing the log level might mask potential problems. If the absence of a certificate is an error condition in some cases, changing the log level to TraceL could lead to missed errors.

  • Suggestion: Consider whether a more nuanced approach is needed. Perhaps a conditional log level based on a configuration setting or a more specific error message could be used. This would allow for flexibility in logging behavior depending on the context.

  • Example:

    if (ref._log_missing_certs_as_warning) {
    WarnL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost;
} else {
    TraceL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost;
}

Conclusion

The patch itself is straightforward and correctly implements the change in log level. However, the lack of context and potential for masking errors are significant concerns. Addressing these issues with a more informative commit message and potentially a more flexible logging mechanism would significantly improve the patch.

TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -127,9 +127,7 @@ int SSL_Initor::findCertificate(SSL *ssl, int *, void *arg) {
if (!ctx) {
//未找到对应的证书 [AUTO-TRANSLATED:d4550e6f]
//No corresponding certificate found
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> lck(ref._mtx);
WarnL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost
<< ", select default certificate of: " << ref._default_vhost[(bool) (arg)];
TraceL << "Can not find any certificate of host: " << vhost;
}
}

Expand Down
Loading