Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Build on arm64 #445

Closed
wants to merge 29 commits into from
Closed

WIP: Build on arm64 #445

wants to merge 29 commits into from

Conversation

danielhollas
Copy link
Contributor

Builds on top of #439

@danielhollas danielhollas changed the base branch from main to remove-artifacts April 23, 2024 09:51
@unkcpz
Copy link
Member

unkcpz commented Apr 23, 2024

Hi @danielhollas, since the self-hosted runner machine not stable. I recommend to use https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions to check the arm64 bulid. It provide 3 months free trail, sadly I had run out of it last year for support arm64 test. It should be simple by just switch the runs-on tag in workflow after activate the account.

@danielhollas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @danielhollas, since the self-hosted runner machine not stable. I recommend to use https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions to check the arm64 bulid. It provide 3 months free trail, sadly I had run out of it last year for support arm64 test. It should be simple by just switch the runs-on tag in workflow after activate the account.

Thanks, I will try that. Will you have time to look with Marnik on the ARM64 runner? For one, I really need jq installed there.

@unkcpz
Copy link
Member

unkcpz commented Apr 23, 2024

Thanks, I will try that. Will you have time to look with Marnik on the ARM64 runner? For one, I really need jq installed there.

Sure, I thought he already did that, since he ask me last week. I'll check with him now.

@danielhollas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will not be able to finish this today, but essentially we will need to implement this approach from official docker docs:

https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/multi-platform/#with-bake

@danielhollas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Most of this PR has been done as part of #446, closing for now. If / when we need to switch building on self-hosted runner I'll open a new one.

@danielhollas danielhollas deleted the build-on-arm64 branch April 30, 2024 20:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants