Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: replace tier4_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId with autoware_internal_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId #10023

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r commented Jan 27, 2025

Description

This replaces tier4_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId messages with autoware_internal_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId to prepare for Autoware Core migration.

Related links

Parent Issue:

This has to be merged with:

This has to be merged before:

How was this PR tested?

The PR was tested on Evaluator:
https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/094116a4-d603-536a-9385-98b1f6797e62?project_id=prd_jt

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

Topic changes

Modifications

Version Topic Type Topic Name Message Type
Old Pub/Sub all messages using this type tier4_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId
New Pub/Sub all messages using this type autoware_internal_planning_msgs/PathWithLaneId

Effects on system behavior

None.

@github-actions github-actions bot added type:documentation Creating or refining documentation. (auto-assigned) component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:common Common packages from the autoware-common repository. (auto-assigned) component:evaluator Evaluation tools for planning, localization etc. (auto-assigned) labels Jan 27, 2025
@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r marked this pull request as draft January 27, 2025 04:03
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r added the run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Jan 27, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 29.90%. Comparing base (874dbdd) to head (36104f3).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...or_path_planner/src/behavior_path_planner_node.cpp 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...velocity_planner_common/scene_module_interface.hpp 66.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
...e_behavior_velocity_stop_line_module/src/scene.cpp 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
common/autoware_trajectory/src/detail/util.cpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...ehavior_velocity_blind_spot_module/src/manager.cpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...ehavior_velocity_speed_bump_module/src/manager.cpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...havior_velocity_traffic_light_module/src/scene.cpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10023      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   29.82%   29.90%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1433     1434       +1     
  Lines      108060   108064       +4     
  Branches    42965    42966       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        32226    32312      +86     
+ Misses      72705    72612      -93     
- Partials     3129     3140      +11     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 32.79% <66.66%> (?)
total 29.81% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️ Carriedforward from 874dbdd

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@youtalk youtalk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member Author

I had a discussion with @yamacir-kit that they would like to wait for a week to merge tier4/scenario_simulator_v2#1518.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:common Common packages from the autoware-common repository. (auto-assigned) component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:evaluator Evaluation tools for planning, localization etc. (auto-assigned) component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) type:documentation Creating or refining documentation. (auto-assigned)
Projects
Status: To Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants