feat(autoware_universe_utils)!: rename from tier4_autoware_utils

[takayuki5168]

Description

• find ./ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/tier4_autoware_utils/autoware_universe_utils/g' {} \;
• Renamed tier4_autoware_utils directory to autoware_universe_utils.

https://github.com/orgs/autowarefoundation/discussions/4881

We apologize for the trouble regarding autoware_ prefix support for Planning/Control and appreciate your cooperation.
Thanks to your help, we are almost done with the individual node support.

As a final step, we are going to create a PR with significant changes, and we would like to inform you of them.
By this PR, We will change as

• tier4_autoware_utils to autoware_universe_utils
• motion_utils to autoware_motion_utils

Although this PR contains many code changes, including a change to almost all nodes in planning/control, we plan to merge the change by a single PR for simplicity and to avoid conflicts and work-in-progress problems.
We will proceed with the utmost care so as not to bring any defects to the main branch, and we appreciate your understanding and cooperation.

Related PR:
autowarefoundation/autoware_tools#52

part of autowarefoundation/autoware#4569

Tests performed

clean build all pacakges and psim/lsim

evaluator
https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/2fa4d6f6-6ea2-5678-be51-bc85601dc37e?project_id=prd_jt

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Interface changes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 46.39640% with 238 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.37%. Comparing base (507e3f4) to head (63e6f84).
Report is 33 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...based_prediction/src/map_based_prediction_node.cpp	0.00%	37 Missing ⚠️
...autoware_autonomous_emergency_braking/src/node.cpp	0.00%	31 Missing ⚠️
..._checker/src/predicted_path_checker_node/utils.cpp	0.00%	18 Missing ⚠️
..._departure_checker_node/lane_departure_checker.cpp	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...toware_map_based_prediction/src/path_generator.cpp	28.57%	10 Missing ⚠️
...ils/include/motion_utils/trajectory/trajectory.hpp	87.69%	6 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...nclude/tier4_planning_rviz_plugin/path/display.hpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...rsuit/autoware_pure_pursuit_lateral_controller.cpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
..._path_checker_node/predicted_path_checker_node.cpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...ed_object_validation/src/object_lanelet_filter.cpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
... and 51 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7538       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   14.84%   28.37%   +13.53%     
===========================================
  Files        1999     1419      -580     
  Lines      139163   104737    -34426     
  Branches    43716    45338     +1622     
===========================================
+ Hits        20661    29723     +9062     
+ Misses      95731    66697    -29034     
+ Partials    22771     8317    -14454     

Flag	Coverage Δ
differential	28.37% <46.39%> (?)
total	?

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mitsudome-r]

The change seems to be quite large. They seems to be just simple replacement of namespace, but have you tested with any PSim/LSim so that Autoware launches without an error?

[kosuke55]

I have tested psim and lsim after clean build of all pacakges