Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCIP-019: Stack MIA Mining Treasury #76

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

CCIP-019: Stack MIA Mining Treasury #76

merged 29 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor

This is a local branch to the project that includes and supersedes the changes proposed in #67, and should allow us to collaboratively work on the PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.29%. Comparing base (4d8f4a2) to head (c85f110).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #76   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.29%   88.29%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1657     1657           
  Branches      275      275           
=======================================
  Hits         1463     1463           
  Misses        174      174           
  Partials       20       20           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d8f4a2...c85f110. Read the comment docs.

Since work is moving forward with this Clarinet file we can use it as the main one, and the legacy one can be referenced when running the old binary + the old Clarinet-legacy.toml.

This updates the GH actions as well.
I forget where the limit is but looks like that was why clarinet check was failing!
Using mia over stx makes it easier to understand what the treasury is associated with, and the treasury name is part of the suggestion here (and fits in the 10char limit): #67 (comment)
Since we're not using the package.json for Clarinet testing it required some changes to be able to run the stxer simulation. Current process is to run npx tsc then node to run the js file in dist.
It's automatically generated but Clarinet is complaining it's not formatted correctly. We don't need it so it's gone now.
@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

whoabuddy commented Aug 7, 2024

I ran a stxer simulation here then realized it all failed because we have testnet addresses in the contracts. Now I see why they were mainnet as of cb6070f so going to work to revert that and add the necessary requirements.

Updated simulation here where all is working except the last step for delegate-stack-stx-many in pox4-fast-pool-v3. It's failing with (err u500).

@friedger is that because I changed the block height in the simulation? How does the output here look to you?

For whatever reason when changing the traits to mainnet even with them listed in the project requirements there is an error that deposit-ft doesn't match the trait spec. Will update the two trait references manually for the updated simulation.
@whoabuddy whoabuddy mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Only STX will be stored as part of this proposal.
@whoabuddy whoabuddy merged commit a2e367c into main Aug 9, 2024
2 checks passed
@whoabuddy whoabuddy deleted the friedger-ccip-019 branch August 9, 2024 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants