Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deserialize secrets inplace for api_keys in PineconeEmbeddingRetriever #634

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mlcocdav
Copy link

@mlcocdav mlcocdav commented Apr 1, 2024

Loading serialised pipeline which includes PineconeEmbeddingRetriever with PineconeDocumentStore currently fails because loading of api keys is not correctly deserialised into Secret class. I propose changes to fix this.

Loading serialised pipeline which includes PineconeEmbeddingRetriever with PineconeDocumentStore currently fails because loading of api keys is not correctly deserialised into Secret class. I propose changes to fix this.
@mlcocdav mlcocdav requested a review from a team as a code owner April 1, 2024 18:00
@mlcocdav mlcocdav requested review from shadeMe and removed request for a team April 1, 2024 18:00
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 1, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@mlcocdav
Copy link
Author

mlcocdav commented Apr 1, 2024

Please solve this bug ASAP as it's preventing me from using serialised haystack pipelines in deployment.

@shadeMe
Copy link
Contributor

shadeMe commented Apr 2, 2024

Thanks for the bug report and the PR! Since the correct fix for it was a bit more involved, we've opened another one. I'll close this in favour of the latter.

@shadeMe shadeMe closed this Apr 2, 2024
@anakin87
Copy link
Member

anakin87 commented Apr 2, 2024

Released a new version: https://pypi.org/project/pinecone_haystack/0.4.1/

@mlcocdav
Copy link
Author

mlcocdav commented Apr 2, 2024

Cheers, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants