Submission 480, Forney/Stuber

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add submission 480
• remove placholder data

Co-authored-by: Christian Forney [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Martin Stuber [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a manuscript project configuration for improved document preparation.
  • Added a comprehensive study on floras and herbaria, highlighting their significance and challenges in digital representation.
  • Included a detailed bibliography for scholarly works related to botany and natural history.

These enhancements enrich the platform's academic offerings and streamline research capabilities for users.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update introduces a structured manuscript project configuration with an _quarto.yml file, defining the main document and its output format. A comprehensive study on floras and herbaria is presented in index.qmd, detailing digitization challenges and the hallerNet platform. Additionally, a references.bib file is added, providing a well-organized bibliography to support the manuscript's academic rigor. Together, these changes enhance the project's scholarly depth and presentation.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
submissions/480/_quarto.yml	New configuration file for manuscript project; sets main article to index.qmd and output format to HTML.
submissions/480/index.qmd	New content file detailing the study of floras and herbaria, emphasizing digitization and ecological data.
submissions/480/references.bib	New bibliography file added, formatted in BibTeX, covering relevant scholarly works in botany and history.

Poem

In a garden lush with tales to tell,
A rabbit hops where knowledge dwells.
With manuscripts and references bright,
We celebrate learning, a joyful sight!
Haller's herbs and data's dance,
In digital fields, let scholars prance! 🐇📚✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5fbfb6 and 89649e6.

Files selected for processing (3)

• submissions/480/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/480/index.qmd (1 hunks)
• submissions/480/references.bib (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• submissions/480/_quarto.yml
• submissions/480/references.bib

Additional comments not posted (7)

submissions/480/index.qmd (7)

1-29: YAML Front Matter: Correctness and Completeness Check

The YAML front matter appears correctly formatted and complete. The authors' information, including ORCID IDs and affiliations, is accurate. Ensure that the bibliography file references.bib is correctly linked and contains all cited references.

---

31-33: Introduction: Clarity and Citation Format

The definitions of "flora" and "herbarium" are clear and well-articulated. The citation format using [@Wagenitz2003] is consistent with the rest of the document.

---

35-39: Historical Context and Citation Check

The historical context is well-presented, and the citations are consistent and correctly formatted. Ensure that all cited works are included in references.bib.

---

41-45: Digitization: Logical Flow and Clarity

The section effectively communicates the significance of digitization in botanical research. The arguments are logically structured, and citations are correctly formatted.

---

47-49: hallerNet Platform Description

The description of the hallerNet platform is clear and provides a comprehensive overview of its capabilities and contributions to historical plant research.

---

51-61: Subsections: Clarity and Coherence

Each subsection is well-structured and provides detailed insights into the respective topics. The integration of historical and technical details is effectively managed.

---

63-65: Conclusion: Effective Summary

The Conclusion effectively summarizes the document's main points and highlights the interdisciplinary solutions offered by the hallerNet platform.