Submission 465, Dominic Weber #26
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: DominicWeber <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new YAML configuration for a manuscript project in Quarto, outlining the project type, main article, and output format. It includes a comprehensive article on Machine Learning in historical research, emphasizing the reliability of data and the integration of machine outputs. Additionally, a new BibTeX references file has been added, providing structured citations relevant to digital humanities and historiography. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Quarto
participant Manuscript
participant References
User->>Quarto: Initiate manuscript project
Quarto->>Manuscript: Load index.qmd
Quarto->>References: Load references.bib
Manuscript->>Quarto: Render HTML output
Quarto-->>User: Display formatted document
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- submissions/465/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
- submissions/465/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/465/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- submissions/465/_quarto.yml
- submissions/465/references.bib
Additional comments not posted (5)
submissions/465/index.qmd (5)
18-19: Abstract is well-written.The abstract provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the article's content.
20-23: Key points are concise and accurate.The key points effectively summarize the main arguments of the article.
28-71: Article content is well-structured.The sections are well-organized and cover the topic comprehensively.
1-25: Verify ORCID and email format.Ensure the ORCID
0000-0002-9265-3388and email[email protected]are correctly formatted and valid.
25-25: Verify existence ofreferences.bib.Ensure that the
references.bibfile is present in the repository.Verification successful
references.bibfile is present.The
references.bibfile exists in thesubmissions/465directory, confirming that the bibliography reference is valid.
submissions/465/references.bibScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the `references.bib` file. # Test: Check if the `references.bib` file exists. Expect: File found. fd --type f --name "references.bib"Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly verify the existence of the `references.bib` file. # Test: Check if the `references.bib` file exists. Expect: File found. fd "references.bib" --type fLength of output: 245
Pull request
Proposed changes
Co-Authored-By: DominicWeber [email protected]
Types of changes
Checklist
Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
references.bibfile with a curated collection of bibliographic entries to support academic writing and enhance research citations.Documentation